2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02048-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Five Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Abstract: Four commercial real-time PCR assays to detect Mycoplasma pneumoniae were tested, and the results were compared with the results for an in-house approach. Despite differences of crossing threshold values of up to 4, assays were able to detect at least 20 CFU/5 l (52 fg DNA/5 l) of sample with the Diagenode kit showing the best clinical sensitivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections have been described for more than 70 years [18]. The implementation of M. pneumoniae nucleic acid amplification techniques enabled better sensitivity and specificity, and quicker results [19,20]. In this study we investigated M. pneumoniae infections resulting in ICU admission of patients in a single institution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections have been described for more than 70 years [18]. The implementation of M. pneumoniae nucleic acid amplification techniques enabled better sensitivity and specificity, and quicker results [19,20]. In this study we investigated M. pneumoniae infections resulting in ICU admission of patients in a single institution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pneumoniae and its gene is an attractive target in the clinical detection of M . pneumoniae by real-time PCR 10 17 . This is the first study detecting P1 antigen to confirm M. pneumoniae infection in children with pneumonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, M. pneumoniae culture and serological tests are insensitive, time-consuming and cross-reactive; therefore, they are not appropriate for rapid and accurate detection of M. pneumoniae infection in clinical practice 9 . Recently, real-time PCR has been reported by many authors as a rapid, sensitive, and specific method, but it still requires at least 2–4 hours for DNA extraction and amplification 10 11 12 13 . In addition, real-time PCR may not discriminate live M. pneumoniae from dead ones 9 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, nucleic acid-based assays targeting M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae have been developed (Dumke and Jacobs 2009 , 2014 ; Winchell et al 2008 ). PCR-based methods have high sensitivity, short turnaround time and the testing can be completed in a single working day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%