2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07299-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of five diagnostic methods for Strongyloides stercoralis infection in Amhara National Regional State, northwest Ethiopia

Abstract: Background Strongyloides stercoralis is an intestinal parasite that can cause chronic infection, hyperinfection and/or a dissemination syndrome in humans. The use of techniques targeting ova fails to detect S. stercoralis, as only larvae of the parasite are excreted in faeces. Due to the absence of “Gold” standard diagnostic method for S. stercoralis, there is a paucity of reported data worldwide. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the performa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is important as the MIFC concentration procedure is still predominantly utilized as a standard diagnostic tool in most microbiology laboratories in Croatia and other neighbouring countries; however, it is actually insufficiently sensitive, taking into account the importance and increasing recognition of this disease. Studies have shown how the Baermann concentration technique and agar plate culture have a much better diagnostic yield, but the number of stool samples, faecal amount and/or faecal dilution also affect sensitivity and detection power (Hailu et al, 2022). Importantly, a meta-analysis by Campo Polanco et al (2014) that evaluated conventional parasitological methods for the diagnosis of S. stercoralis found the highest sensitivity for the agar plate method (89%), followed by the Baermann technique (72%), formalin-ether concentration technique (which is akin to the MIFC method) (48%) and direct wet smear (21%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is important as the MIFC concentration procedure is still predominantly utilized as a standard diagnostic tool in most microbiology laboratories in Croatia and other neighbouring countries; however, it is actually insufficiently sensitive, taking into account the importance and increasing recognition of this disease. Studies have shown how the Baermann concentration technique and agar plate culture have a much better diagnostic yield, but the number of stool samples, faecal amount and/or faecal dilution also affect sensitivity and detection power (Hailu et al, 2022). Importantly, a meta-analysis by Campo Polanco et al (2014) that evaluated conventional parasitological methods for the diagnosis of S. stercoralis found the highest sensitivity for the agar plate method (89%), followed by the Baermann technique (72%), formalin-ether concentration technique (which is akin to the MIFC method) (48%) and direct wet smear (21%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption was based on the prevalence of symptoms among cases with diagnosed infection 26 and the fact that the sensitivity of Baermann or stool culture is in the order of 50%. 11,27,28 Therefore, we are ignoring potential YLDs in undiagnosed cases of infection, meaning that our estimates of cost-effectiveness are conservative. However, as this equally affects our estimates for school-based and community-based PC, we do not expect that this uncertainty about the proportion of infected cases with symptoms affects our conclusions about community-based PC being the most cost-effective strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…infection. The parasitological tests such as Baermann and Agar plate culture for S. stercoralis [54] and a coproantigen ELISA for Taenia spp. infection [55,56] would provide a considerably higher sensitivity than FECT analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%