2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of FilmArray respiratory panel multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of pathogens in adult outpatients with acute respiratory tract infection

Abstract: Although viruses are the major pathogen that causes upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and acute bronchitis, antibiotics have been prescribed. This was a prospective observational study in influenza epidemics that enrolled adult outpatients who visited a hospital with respiratory tract infection symptoms. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of FilmArray respiratory panel (RP). Fifty patients were enrolled. FilmArray RP detected the pathogens in 28 patients. The common pathogens were influenza viru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This present study is one of the several that have examined the application of FA‐RP in Asia . Compared with other published studies, our study focused on adults with more severe pneumonia conditions, and to the best of our knowledge, it is the only study that has covered two consecutive pandemic seasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This present study is one of the several that have examined the application of FA‐RP in Asia . Compared with other published studies, our study focused on adults with more severe pneumonia conditions, and to the best of our knowledge, it is the only study that has covered two consecutive pandemic seasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study demonstrate that the BioFire FA RP can reliably detect a broad range of respiratory pathogens when performed using specimens collected by bronchoscopy. Thus far, the majority of studies evaluating the performance of the FA RP were done using NP swabs (Andersson et al 2014;Babady et al 2018;Butt et al 2014;Hayden et al 2012;Kaku et al 2018;Loeffelholz et al 2011;Pierce et al 2012;Renaud et al 2012;Van Wesenbeeck et al 2013). Only a few studies have included LRT specimens, such as BAL and BAS, in addition to URT samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies agree that POCT for respiratory infections improve the targeted use of antiviral treatment [4,6,8,9,12], which is also supported by the present study. In contrast, the effect on prescription and duration of antibiotic treatment and hospitalisation time is debatable [4,5,[7][8][9][10][11]. Most studies support that prescription and duration of antibiotic treatment is not significantly reduced by POC testing [4,[7][8][9], and three studies found no reduction in duration of hospitalisation [7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have evaluated the benefits of POC testing for respiratory pathogens on patient management [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], but their conclusions are conflicting and the benefits for patient management are therefore not fully understood. Several studies found that POC testing may improve patient management by deferring hospital admission [3], reducing hospitalisation time [4,5], improving targeted use of antiviral treatment [4,[6][7][8][9]12], reducing prescription [10] and duration of antibiotic treatment [5], reducing in-hospital isolation time [8], improving use of side room isolation facilities [6] and decreasing overall costs of hospitalisation [3,5,12,13]. In contrast, other studies reported that POC testing for respiratory pathogens does not significantly reduce prescription or duration of antibiotics [4,[7][8][9]11], do not reduce hospitalisation time or defer admissions [7][8][9] and do not reduce the risk of death or readmission [4,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%