2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.01.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of fermentation conditions to improve the sensory quality of broomcorn millet sour porridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned by Wang, Liu, Jing, Fan, and Cai (), 10 panelists ( n = 10; including five females and five males, aging from 27 to 50 years) familiar with sensory evaluation techniques and regular consumers of dairy desserts, evaluated the sensory quality of the prepared samples. The panelists were presented with six coded dairy dessert samples (40 g) developed with different concentrations of date syrup, date powder, and sugar, respectively, according to the combinations generating by the mixture design: 2–14–0% (MDD 1 ), 2–2–12% (MDD 2 ), 2–2–12% (MDD 3 ), 2–14–0% (MDD 4 ), 14–2–0% (MDD 5 ), and 14–2–0% (MDD 6 ), and two other formulations developed with date syrup 16–0–0% (SDD) and date powder 0–16–0% (PDD), using a 5‐point hedonic scale, ranging from 5 (extremely liked) to 1 (extremely disliked), for each sensory attribute: texture, hardness, granularity, sweetness, color, odor, flavor, and savor with an evaluation of the overall acceptability on a scale of 1–9.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned by Wang, Liu, Jing, Fan, and Cai (), 10 panelists ( n = 10; including five females and five males, aging from 27 to 50 years) familiar with sensory evaluation techniques and regular consumers of dairy desserts, evaluated the sensory quality of the prepared samples. The panelists were presented with six coded dairy dessert samples (40 g) developed with different concentrations of date syrup, date powder, and sugar, respectively, according to the combinations generating by the mixture design: 2–14–0% (MDD 1 ), 2–2–12% (MDD 2 ), 2–2–12% (MDD 3 ), 2–14–0% (MDD 4 ), 14–2–0% (MDD 5 ), and 14–2–0% (MDD 6 ), and two other formulations developed with date syrup 16–0–0% (SDD) and date powder 0–16–0% (PDD), using a 5‐point hedonic scale, ranging from 5 (extremely liked) to 1 (extremely disliked), for each sensory attribute: texture, hardness, granularity, sweetness, color, odor, flavor, and savor with an evaluation of the overall acceptability on a scale of 1–9.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six trained team members participated in the sensory research of tomatoes. Each tomato was tasted and scored by at least five consumers or farmers on a 1–5 scale for the color (green, pink, and red), flavor (smelly, light smelly and fragrance), taste (sour, light sour and sugary) and texture (firm, light firm, and soft) (Torbica et al, 2016; Q. Wang, Liu, Jing, Fan, & Cai, 2019). The average values of these scores were defined as sensory evaluation scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fermentation is used to make proso millet beverages (i.e., wine and beer, as discussed in Section 6.5) and porridge (Section 6.1). Process optimization involves selection of factors such as bacteria (Wang, Liu, Jing, Fan, & Cai, 2019) and yeast strains (Zarnkow, Faltermaier, Back, Gastl, & Arendt, 2010), fermentation time and temperature, and in the case of porridge the ratio of liquid to solids (Wang et al., 2019). Numerous studies on millets, summarized by Adebiyi et al.…”
Section: Processing: Part Of the Yellow Cluster But Linked To All Otmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al. (2019) compared fermentation of proso millet via lactic acid bacteria, acetic acid bacteria, and yeast. Response surface methodology was used to optimize the fermentation conditions based on sensory scores for color, flavor, taste, and texture.…”
Section: The Green Cluster: Quality Of Products With Proso Milletmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation