2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of femoral strains with cementless proximal-fill femoral implants of varied stem length

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clear distal load transfer after the implantation of both short stems demonstrated in this study is congruent with previous studies, which have found a similar distally shifting load distribution pattern as a result of implant insertion (24,61,62). Despite the fact that short stem femoral implants have displayed a better biomechanical behavior preserving a stain distribution closer to the intact bone according to previous studies (24,28,42,43,(63)(64)(65), the implantation of a stiffer material absorbs the load and transfers it distally, leaving the proximal region of the calcar somewhat stress-shielded. The data presented here demonstrate that strain shielding and proximal unloading of the femur occurred even when using short-stem implants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The clear distal load transfer after the implantation of both short stems demonstrated in this study is congruent with previous studies, which have found a similar distally shifting load distribution pattern as a result of implant insertion (24,61,62). Despite the fact that short stem femoral implants have displayed a better biomechanical behavior preserving a stain distribution closer to the intact bone according to previous studies (24,28,42,43,(63)(64)(65), the implantation of a stiffer material absorbs the load and transfers it distally, leaving the proximal region of the calcar somewhat stress-shielded. The data presented here demonstrate that strain shielding and proximal unloading of the femur occurred even when using short-stem implants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…DIC strain analysis exhibited that specimens implanted with reduced 222 length prostheses most closely matched the cortical strain distribution patterns of the 223 unimplanted specimens and thus, within this model, would be less likely to initiate a 224 proximal stress shielding response. In a recent study, Arno et al [22] stems across a variety of stem designs [23][24][25][26][27]. Similarly, Decking et al [25] reported 232 significant improvement in strain distribution when comparing a stemless femoral neck 233 prosthesis to two long stemmed prostheses.…”
Section: Femoral Component Micromotion 148mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanical research relies on animal models for convenient and cost-effective preliminary evaluation. In particular, accurate proxies are essential to orthopaedic surgical device development, including implant prototypes [ 1 , 2 ], joint replacements, other devices such as suture anchors [ 3 ], and accurate representations of ballistic injury. Comparing the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of animal bones and soft tissue structures with those of humans is the basis for development of suitable models for both in vivo and in situ evaluation of devices and injury models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%