Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of exposure time and visible light irradiation in LCD 3D printing of ibuprofen extended release tablets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DLP 3D printer used in this study was equipped with a visible-light source (400–700 nm), which offers numerous benefits over UV light, such as being more energy efficient with a reduced risk of eye damage and improved biocompatibility and functional group tolerance [ 64 , 65 , 66 ]. Here, PEGDA was selected because it is one of the most commonly used photocurable materials for biomedical applications [ 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DLP 3D printer used in this study was equipped with a visible-light source (400–700 nm), which offers numerous benefits over UV light, such as being more energy efficient with a reduced risk of eye damage and improved biocompatibility and functional group tolerance [ 64 , 65 , 66 ]. Here, PEGDA was selected because it is one of the most commonly used photocurable materials for biomedical applications [ 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that SLA < LCD < DLP in terms of surface bump, DLP > LCD > SLA in terms of print accuracy and DLP > SLA > LCD based on surface roughness. Madžarević and Ibrić (2021), in their study, compared the dimensional accuracy of the DLP and LCD-SLA-printed ibuprofen tablets and found that LCD-based printers are cheaper and less precise than the DLP printers. Lo Giudice et al (2021) justified the use of entry-level LCD-SLA-fabricated orthodontic models, as the inaccuracy of the part manufactured was less than 0.25 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDM and related techniques have been used for a wide range of applications and allowed the manufacturing of variously engineered solid dosage forms [9][10][11][12], while SLS has been investigated for its power to fabricate rapidly disintegrating tablets [13][14][15][16][17]. SLA and DLP 3D printing have been instead used to fabricate controlled release dosage forms, hydrogels and polypills [7,[18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from a pharmaceutical perspective, such mechanical attributes are not desirable as orally administered dosage forms should completely break down to release their drug content and to then be eliminated with no risk of leaving tablet fragments in the gastrointestinal tract [ 35 ]. Additionally, despite the existence of biocompatible commercially available resins designed for special applications, such as dentistry [ 36 , 37 ], only a limited number of photopolymer formulations have been investigated for pharmaceutical applications [ 20 , 22 , 32 , 38 ]. Such limitations, therefore, lay the foundations for an extensive screening of photopolymer formulations and their respective evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%