2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2004.11.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ethyl 2-carbomethoxyethenesulfinates as 2-hydroxymethyl enethiol equivalents in the Diels–Alder reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, we sought to probe the generality of the reaction, given a source of the applicable cycloadducts. 34 Initial reactions involved various Grignard reagents on the bicyclic sulfinate 2a. A number of aromatic and heteroaromatic nucleophiles were evaluated, but of those employed only p-TolMgBr demonstrated comparable reactivity, providing triaryl derivative 6 as a single diastereomer ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As such, we sought to probe the generality of the reaction, given a source of the applicable cycloadducts. 34 Initial reactions involved various Grignard reagents on the bicyclic sulfinate 2a. A number of aromatic and heteroaromatic nucleophiles were evaluated, but of those employed only p-TolMgBr demonstrated comparable reactivity, providing triaryl derivative 6 as a single diastereomer ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 The preparation of compound 18 and cycloadduct 10 is found in the Supplementary data. The preparation of the other cycloadducts has already been described.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…29 To a flame dried RBF was added scratched magnesium turnings (348 mg, 1.43 mmol), a crystal of iodine and THF (5 mL). 1-Bromooctane-d 17 (1.00 g, 4.76 mmol) was added dropwise and the reaction was stirred under reflux until complete formation of Grignard reagent was indicated by GC analysis (3.5 h).…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%