2008
DOI: 10.5141/jefb.2008.31.3.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Environmental Factors to Determine the Distribution of Functional Feeding Groups of Benthic Macroinvertebrates Using an Artificial Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that a range of environmental factors affect the trait diversity of the macrofauna (Park et al, 2008). For example, the functional groups of tube-dwellers/burrowers and deposit feeders are often abundant in silty-sand habitats, whereas sandy sediments often are characterized by motile surface crawlers and carnivores/scavengers (Kun et al, 2019).…”
Section: Trait Composition In Different Habitatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that a range of environmental factors affect the trait diversity of the macrofauna (Park et al, 2008). For example, the functional groups of tube-dwellers/burrowers and deposit feeders are often abundant in silty-sand habitats, whereas sandy sediments often are characterized by motile surface crawlers and carnivores/scavengers (Kun et al, 2019).…”
Section: Trait Composition In Different Habitatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is consistent with a previous report from Chen and Ma (2017), who found that phytophages were the dominant FFG in a mangrove wetland (located in same area as the wetland in the current study) whether or not the area had been invaded by Spartina alterniflora. In coastal or estuarine ecosys- Table 1 Relationships between the macrobenthic faunal functional feeding groups (based on the proportion of total species richness, abundance and biomass represented by each group) and environmental factors (vegetation characteristics and sediment physicochemical properties) in the mangrove succession at Zhanjiang, South China, as indicated by stepwise regression analyses How and why do the macrobenthic faunal FFGs change during mangrove succession Many environmental factors can affect the functional diversity of macrobenthic fauna (Park et al 2008). Along the north coast of Spain, for example, the occurrence of different macroinvertebrate FFGs was best explained by chlorophyll-a concentration, wave exposure, sea surface temperature, and beach slope (Rodil et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some scientists prefer to use benthic macroinvertebrates in bioassessment (Reece & Richardson, 2000). Benthic macroinvertebrates continuously respond to short-and long-term disturbances of their habitat (Park et al, 2008), such as flooding, siltation brought about by deforestation (Stanford, 2006), agriculture effluents, and urban pollution (Compin & Céréghino, 2007). In addition, their sedentary foraging, short life cycles, and preference for habitats around toxic sediments make benthic macroinvertebrates ideal candidates for bioassessment indicators (Reece & Richardson, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution and proportion of FFG within a stream are influenced by the availability and amount of specific food resources (Vannote et al, 1980). Changes in the distribution of FFGs in spatial scale denote variations in the food base's environmental conditions (Park et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%