Evaluation of Endovenous Laser Ablation in the Management of Varicose Veins

Abstract

BackgroundThe treatment of varicose veins has undergone tremendous changes over the years. High ligation of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) and stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV) have been considered standard treatments for GSV insufficiency for over a century and are still adopted as the preferred method in the majority of surgical centers in North Africa. However, the increase in minimally invasive treatments such as endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, and cryo-stripping has produced excellent results. Most patients who underwent these minimally invasive treatments were satisfied with their outcomes. Methodology and resultsIn this clinical and prospective study, 30 cases (19 male and 11 female) of primary varicose veins underwent endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), and their outcomes were reviewed, and their results were satisfying to the patients. After EVLA with or without sclerotherapy, no major complications occurred (recurrence or recanalization) at the time of the study, although minor complications were quite common and included bruising or ecchymosis, postoperative pain that required analgesics, superficial thrombophlebitis, and skin burns that were very responsive to medical treatment. ConclusionEndovenous laser ablation continues to be a valid minimally invasive method for treating varicose veins with minimal complications and a very short recovery period, which appeals to patients.

Patient perceptions and preferences of minimally invasive treatment modalities in varicose veins: a cross-sectional survey

“…Traditional surgical modalities include high ligation of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ), the great saphenous vein (GSV) stripping and phlebectomy. MIT refers to procedures such as endovenous mechanochemical ablation (EMCA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) (8)(9)(10)(11). These MIT have consistently been reported to reduce trauma, improve aesthetic outcomes, and expedite recovery compared to traditional surgical modalities.…”