1971
DOI: 10.1016/0047-7206(71)90047-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of emulsions and other recording media for 100 and 1000kV electron microscopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two methods were used to reduce the radiation damage: (i) The beam current was kept to a minimum by using an extremely small condenser aperture (10 ,um); and (ii) The diffraction patterns were recorded on very sensitive No-Screen X-ray films. This film has been shown to be 17 times more sensitive than ordinary electron image plates (13). Therefore, the specimen radiation damage is greatly reduced.…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Two methods were used to reduce the radiation damage: (i) The beam current was kept to a minimum by using an extremely small condenser aperture (10 ,um); and (ii) The diffraction patterns were recorded on very sensitive No-Screen X-ray films. This film has been shown to be 17 times more sensitive than ordinary electron image plates (13). Therefore, the specimen radiation damage is greatly reduced.…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because of this radiation sensitivity the crystals were never imaged beforehand. Exposures well below the cited limit were guaranteed by use of Kodak X-ray film which has been found to be significantly more sensitive than electron image plates to electrons at several accelerating voltages (Matricardi, Wray & Parsons, 1972).…”
Section: Electron Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation damage was further minimized by liquid nitrogen cooling of the specimen stage. For all experiments, diffraction patterns were recorded on Kodak no-screen X-ray film which is 17-fold more sensitive than electron image plates at 100 kV (Matricardi, Wray & Parsons, 1972). Diffraction spacings were calibrated by simultaneous recording of single-crystal paraffin and Au ° powder diffraction patterns from a region of the specimen grid upon which a thin film of Au ° had been evaporated.…”
Section: Electron Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%