2001
DOI: 10.2208/jscej.2001.694_195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Elastic Shear Modulus G in Laboratory Bender Element Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The wave propagated through the sample and was detected by the BE receiver plate at the bottom. The shear wave travel time (Dt ) was deˆned as``start-to-start'' between two instants of the generated wave and theˆrst de‰ection of the received wave (Kawaguchi et al, 2001). The travel distance (L) was deˆned as``tip-to-tip'' distance between the transmitter and the receiver of BE plates (Viggiani and Atkinson, 1995).…”
Section: Bender Element Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wave propagated through the sample and was detected by the BE receiver plate at the bottom. The shear wave travel time (Dt ) was deˆned as``start-to-start'' between two instants of the generated wave and theˆrst de‰ection of the received wave (Kawaguchi et al, 2001). The travel distance (L) was deˆned as``tip-to-tip'' distance between the transmitter and the receiver of BE plates (Viggiani and Atkinson, 1995).…”
Section: Bender Element Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Viggiani and Atkinson (1995), Lohani et al (1999) and Kawaguchi et al (2001), the travel time corresponding to the peak-to peak distance between the input and output signals might be globally wrong except for high frequency input signals. The di‹culty to establish the peak in the output signal may generate errors mainly for square waves where no clear peak appears, particularly at low frequencies, for which the wave period is large.…”
Section: Bender-extender Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results have been relatively inconsistent. The bender elements technique now extensively used in soil mechanics (e.g., Viggiani and Atkinson, 1995; Brignoli et al, 1996; Fratta and Santamarina, 1996; Fam and Santamarina, 1997; Kawaguchi et al, 2001; Leong et al, 2005) oŠers an e‹cient alternative despite some shortcomings relative to interpretation methods. The most common bender element device was developed by Shirley and Hampton (1977): it allows the propagation of shear waves, with only the shear modulus G directly measurable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can be calculated at measurement of Gvh (Shibuya et al, 1997). The travel time for Gvh by the Bender Element was deˆned as`s tart-to-start'' of the generated and arriving waves (Kawaguchi et al, 2001). …”
Section: Laboratory Tests For Using Reconstituted Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%