2015
DOI: 10.5114/wo.2015.53371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of robotic stereotactic body radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for vertebral metastases

Abstract: Aim of the studyThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of applying CyberKnife (CK) radiosurgery in patients with spinal metastases.Material and methodsTwenty-eight patients with vertebral metastases treated using the CK system were included in the study. Eleven patients suffered from pain, and in 1 case neurological symptoms were observed. The remaining patients were free from clinical symptoms of metastatic disease. The doses applied ranged between 8 and 40 Gy delivered in 4 fractio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where both are reported, the TTP PR result was lower than for assessable patients only [(62% vs 82% (55), 47% vs 62% (74), 60% vs 69% (38), 77% vs 91% (32), 61% vs 93% (68), and 71% vs 88% (4, 61)]. Overall response rates for PR varied from 38% (n = 28) (34) to 100% (n = 18) (52) in assessable patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Where both are reported, the TTP PR result was lower than for assessable patients only [(62% vs 82% (55), 47% vs 62% (74), 60% vs 69% (38), 77% vs 91% (32), 61% vs 93% (68), and 71% vs 88% (4, 61)]. Overall response rates for PR varied from 38% (n = 28) (34) to 100% (n = 18) (52) in assessable patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the TTP analysis, the range of PR outcomes varied from 27% (n = 11) (34) to 98% (n = 52) (35). LC rates at 1 year ranged from 25% (n = 28 patients) to 95.5% (n = 64 lesions) (36,37).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PET-CT (18F-Choline-, 11C-Choline-, 11C-Octane-, 18F-NaF-, 18 F-DCFBC-PET-CT) showed to be more sensitive than bone scintigraphy, MRI or CT in case of bone metastases detection especially in patients with PSA concentration over 3 ng/ml but there is still no one "gold standard" imaging technique to delineate metastasized prostate cancer [7,8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%