2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1274-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of effects of Mycoplasma mastitis on milk composition in dairy cattle from South Australia

Abstract: Background Mycoplasma mastitis is increasingly posing significant impact on dairy industry. Although the effects of major conventional mastitis pathogens on milk components has been widely addressed in the literature, limited data on the effects of different Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma spp. on milk quality and quantity is available. The aim of this study was to determine the casual relationship of Mycoplasma spp. and A. laidlawii to mastitis and compare them to subclinical mastitis caused by conventional masti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While most of the techniques are based on determining the number of somatic cells as a diagnostic criterion for the diagnosis of subclinical pathology of cows (Yablonskyi and Zhelavskyi, 2007;Kurjogi et al, 2014;Thompson-Crispi et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2015;Delfani et al, 2017;Cao et al, 2018). Despite this, the researchers constantly encountered problems in interpreting the results (Singh et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2014;Al-Farha et al, 2017;Sato et al, 2017). It was related to the of dynamic changes in the quantitative composition of somatic cells in different periods of lactation, daily oscillations in their numbers; study species and individual peculiarities of animals (Zhelavskyi, 2005;Kurjogi et al, 2014;Lombardini et al, 2017;Pang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most of the techniques are based on determining the number of somatic cells as a diagnostic criterion for the diagnosis of subclinical pathology of cows (Yablonskyi and Zhelavskyi, 2007;Kurjogi et al, 2014;Thompson-Crispi et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2015;Delfani et al, 2017;Cao et al, 2018). Despite this, the researchers constantly encountered problems in interpreting the results (Singh et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2014;Al-Farha et al, 2017;Sato et al, 2017). It was related to the of dynamic changes in the quantitative composition of somatic cells in different periods of lactation, daily oscillations in their numbers; study species and individual peculiarities of animals (Zhelavskyi, 2005;Kurjogi et al, 2014;Lombardini et al, 2017;Pang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies claim that Acholeplasma species, another genus of the mollicutes class, considered as non-pathogenic saprophyte and milk contaminant [7,8] . However, other studies have shown that involving of A. laidlawii in mastitis cannot be excluded [9][10][11] . Additionally, Acholeplasma axanthum has been isolated from bovine milk harvested from cattle suffering from mastitis [4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most previous studies targeted species-specific oligonucleotides and disregarded co-infection of Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma species. The clinical importance of co-infection with Mycoplasma has been reported [9,21] . Given that mollicutes have a small genome and low G-C content [22] , a sensitive, accurate and broad-species detection is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycoplasma bovis infection is of major importance in cattle production in European countries and the United States of America (USA), causing large economic losses (Tenk, 2005).In Europe, the damage caused annually by mycoplasmosis in general in cattle is estimated at 576 million Euros and is responsible for one third of all pneumonia cases in calves. In the last decade M. bovis infection has been expanded to new geographical areas, including Ireland (Blackburn et al, 2007;Bell et al, 2012) and Greece (Filioussis et al, 2007), where it was not previously registered, as well as on other continents: parts of South America (Cerdá et al, 2000) and Australia (Al-Farha et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%