Evaluation of effect of warm local anesthetics on pain perception during dental injections in children: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial

Gümüş, Hüsniye; Aydınbelge, Mustafa

doi:10.1007/s00784-019-03086-6

Cited by 13 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Removing the duplicate articles, 79 records were screened by the title and abstract. The full text of the seven potentially relevant papers were evaluated [ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ]. Among them, three papers were excluded [ 12 14 15 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reasons for exclusion are presented in table 1 . As a result, four studies were included in this final systematic review [ 9 10 11 13 ] ( Fig. 1 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the four included studies, one was published in 2019, two in 2018, and one in 2002. All studies had the randomized split-mouth design [ 9 10 11 13 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Both infiltrations and blocks were evaluated in the study by Ram et al, 2002 [13]. [11,13], and the other two studies used Wong Baker-FACES Pain Scale (WB-FPS) [9,10]. Only the study by Ram et al, 2002, reported Conclusions: Based on the aforementioned discussion, the following conclusions can be drawn:…”

Section: Type Of Injectionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…(which used articaine 4%) [9], the remaining three studies reported the usage of lignocaine [10,11,13]. A high concentration of epinephrine (1:1,00,000) was used in two studies [11,13].…”

Section: Not Evaluatedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Effect of warming local anesthesia solutions before intraoral administration in dentistry: a systematic review

Tirupathi

Rajasekhar²

2020

J Dent Anesth Pain Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of warmed and unwarmed local anesthesia solutions in reduction of pain during intraoral injection administration. Methods: PubMed, Ovid SP, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from publication years 1990 to 2020 with relevant MeSH terms. Studies were screened by titles and abstracts, followed by full-texts evaluation of the included studies. Results: A total of four studies were included in the systematic review. Outcomes evaluated were subjective and objective pain during administration of the warmed local anesthesia solution in comparison with the unwarmed local anesthesia solution. Among the four studies that evaluated the self-reported pain score, three studies showed significantly lower pain scores associated with warmed local anesthesia. Only two studies evaluated the observed pain score, and both of them reported a significantly lower pain reaction with the warmed local anesthesia solution. Conclusion: Within the limits of this systematic review, warming the local anesthesia solution to body temperature (37°C) before administration seemed to reduce the discomfort during intraoral local anaesthesia administration, and more high-quality studies should be carried out to validate the same.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reasons for exclusion are presented in table 1 . As a result, four studies were included in this final systematic review [ 9 10 11 13 ] ( Fig. 1 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the four included studies, one was published in 2019, two in 2018, and one in 2002. All studies had the randomized split-mouth design [ 9 10 11 13 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Type Of Injectionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…(which used articaine 4%) [9], the remaining three studies reported the usage of lignocaine [10,11,13]. A high concentration of epinephrine (1:1,00,000) was used in two studies [11,13].…”

Section: Not Evaluatedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations