1999
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ectopic pregnancy by magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Patients (n = 37) suspected of ectopic pregnancy were prospectively evaluated with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to assess the capability of MR imaging in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Five levels of confidence were defined: diagnostic, suspicious, equivocal, questionable, and negative. Tubal wall enhancement and presence of tubal haematoma or gestational sac-like structure were considered diagnostic findings. There were 21 diagnostic, two suspicious, eight equivocal, and six negative findings. MR find… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although sagittal T2-weighted sequence is the basic sequence in MRI performed in gynaecologic emergencies [5], axial and coronal views are helpful in suspicion of ectopic pregnancy to show the relationship between the gestational sac and the myometrium; additionally, T1-weighted sequence performed in one of these three planes is helpful to identify blood. It has been established that tubal wall enhancement and fresh tubal hematoma were specific for ectopic pregnancy, whereas a gestational sac-like structure without tubal structure was equivocal because of the differential diagnosis of cystic masses of the ovary [6]. By contrast, little has been reported about MRI findings in interstitial pregnancy [3,4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although sagittal T2-weighted sequence is the basic sequence in MRI performed in gynaecologic emergencies [5], axial and coronal views are helpful in suspicion of ectopic pregnancy to show the relationship between the gestational sac and the myometrium; additionally, T1-weighted sequence performed in one of these three planes is helpful to identify blood. It has been established that tubal wall enhancement and fresh tubal hematoma were specific for ectopic pregnancy, whereas a gestational sac-like structure without tubal structure was equivocal because of the differential diagnosis of cystic masses of the ovary [6]. By contrast, little has been reported about MRI findings in interstitial pregnancy [3,4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When TVS findings are indeterminate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can serve as a problemsolving tool owing to its excellent tissue contrast. The advantage of MRI for the diagnosis of EP has been reported to be its capability to identify fresh blood and to precisely localize the site of implantation [11,12]. The recognition of MRI findings in EP is essential for accurate interpretation of this condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The classic findings of ectopic pregnancy on MRI are lack of intrauterine pregnancy, hemoperitoneum, tubal mass, hematosalpinx and wall enhancement of the dilated fallopian tube. 4,5 The presence of hematosalpinx in a woman with a positive pregnancy test and with no intrauterine gestational sac is highly concerning for ectopic pregnancy, even in the absence of a clearly identifiable extra-uterine gestational sac. 5 The inclusion of a T1-weighted pulse sequence is helpful in identifying blood products and is recommended as part of imaging protocol for pregnant patients.…”
Section: Diagnosis: Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%