2021
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-1721-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ECMWF IFS-AER (CAMS) operational forecasts during cycle 41r1–46r1 with calibrated ceilometer profiles over Germany

Abstract: Abstract. Aerosol forecasts by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System aerosol module (IFS-AER) for the years 2016–2019 (cycles 41r1–46r1) are compared to vertical profiles of particle backscatter from the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) ceilometer network. The system has been developed in the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) and its precursors. The focus of this article is to evaluate the realism of the vertical aerosol distribution from 0.4 to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(152 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these computed area values, we manually tune thresholds so that they result in the selection of the dust events over Central Europe during the beginning and end of February 2021 and beginning of March 2021: If more than 25% of cells are classified as dusty and the median DOD is greater than 0.075, we select the date as a dust day. For both criteria, we use DOD data from the near‐real‐time CAMS forecast at initialisation time, which shows reasonable skill compared with measurements (Flentje et al, 2021; Gueymard & Yang, 2020). Finally we manually analyse the selected days for other prominent aerosol species over the selected areas, to ensure mineral dust is the dominant aerosol.…”
Section: Model Descriptions and Measurement Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these computed area values, we manually tune thresholds so that they result in the selection of the dust events over Central Europe during the beginning and end of February 2021 and beginning of March 2021: If more than 25% of cells are classified as dusty and the median DOD is greater than 0.075, we select the date as a dust day. For both criteria, we use DOD data from the near‐real‐time CAMS forecast at initialisation time, which shows reasonable skill compared with measurements (Flentje et al, 2021; Gueymard & Yang, 2020). Finally we manually analyse the selected days for other prominent aerosol species over the selected areas, to ensure mineral dust is the dominant aerosol.…”
Section: Model Descriptions and Measurement Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundary conditions were taken from CAMS CIFS global model simulations (Flentje et al, 2021). Meteorological data were obtained from the operational analysis of the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) (Flentje et al, 2021). Anthropogenic emissions of gases 295 and particles were taken from the CAMS-REG-AP inventory (version v5.1_REF2.1) (Kuenen et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%