2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-022-06218-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of East Asian Meiyu from CMIP6/AMIP simulations

Abstract: East Asian Meiyu simulated by 35 global atmospheric models from the 6 th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) / Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) were systematically evaluated for 1998-2014. The results show that most of the CMIP6/AMIP model can hardly reproduce the observed spatial pattern and interannual variability of East Asian Meiyu. The spatial pattern is relatively better simulated over Southern Korea and Japan where 14 out of 35 models have realistically simulated precipitation,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a link between model bias and corresponding response has been shown to hold, for example, in the case of summer precipitation over Asia (Wilcox et al, 2015), global SST patterns and overlying rainfall changes (He and Soden, 2016), tropical rainfall (Chadwick, 2016) and circulation (Zhou and Xie, 2015) extratropical stationary eddies and their influence on tropical convection (Chen et al, 2018) and Arctic Ocean temperature (Park and Lee, 2021). Given that state-of-the-art climate models still suffer from large and persistent biases in simulating magnitude and distribution of the monsoon precipitation and circulation across Asia (Wilcox et al, 2020;Rajendran et al, 2022;Tong et al, 2022), it is certainly plausible for these biases to exert a sizeable control on the aerosol-induced monsoon changes. Climatological biases in climate models could lead to unrealistic projections of anthropogenic climate change and add further uncertainties, for example due to their possible non-stationarity (Krinner and Flanner, 2018).…”
Section: A Mechanism Linking Model Climatology To Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a link between model bias and corresponding response has been shown to hold, for example, in the case of summer precipitation over Asia (Wilcox et al, 2015), global SST patterns and overlying rainfall changes (He and Soden, 2016), tropical rainfall (Chadwick, 2016) and circulation (Zhou and Xie, 2015) extratropical stationary eddies and their influence on tropical convection (Chen et al, 2018) and Arctic Ocean temperature (Park and Lee, 2021). Given that state-of-the-art climate models still suffer from large and persistent biases in simulating magnitude and distribution of the monsoon precipitation and circulation across Asia (Wilcox et al, 2020;Rajendran et al, 2022;Tong et al, 2022), it is certainly plausible for these biases to exert a sizeable control on the aerosol-induced monsoon changes. Climatological biases in climate models could lead to unrealistic projections of anthropogenic climate change and add further uncertainties, for example due to their possible non-stationarity (Krinner and Flanner, 2018).…”
Section: A Mechanism Linking Model Climatology To Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global climate models (GCMs) are a major tool for studying future climate change including extreme precipitation (i.e., Ban et al., 2015; L. Lin et al., 2016, 2018; O’Gorman & Schneider, 2009; Tong et al., 2022), severe storms (e.g., Del Genio et al., 2007), and lightning (Finney et al., 2014; Romps et al., 2014). It is predicted that extreme precipitation and the most severe storms will increase (e.g., Bao et al., 2017) and intensify (O’Gorman, 2015) in a warmer climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insufficient description of the SOD maintains an important source of model uncertainty (Elvidge et al., 2019; van Niekerk et al., 2020). The global climate models (GCMs) commonly underestimate (overestimate) precipitation over the southeastern China (Tibetan Plateau, TP) (Jiang et al., 2020; Kusunoki, 2018; Tong et al., 2022; Jiang et al., 2016; Xin et al., 2020; Alapaty et al., 2012; H. Chen et al., 2010; C. Zhao et al., 2020; Scinocca et al., 2016). The simulated precipitation biases of the GCMs can be clearly reduced by adopting the high‐resolution regional climate models (RCMs) (Gao et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2010; Bao et al., 2015; H. Yang et al., 2016; Ma et al., 2015; L. Zou & Zhou, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insufficient description of the SOD maintains an important source of model uncertainty (Elvidge et al, 2019;van Niekerk et al, 2020). The global climate models (GCMs) commonly underestimate (overestimate) precipitation over the southeastern China (Tibetan Plateau, TP) (Jiang et al, 2020;Kusunoki, 2018;Tong et al, 2022;Jiang et al, 2016;Xin et al, 2020;Alapaty et al, 2012;H. Chen et al, 2010;C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%