2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-006-0111-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of early DNA damage in healthcare workers handling antineoplastic drugs

Abstract: The employment of the sensitive comet assay, which is able to detect early the effects of a recent exposure to genotoxic substances, allowed us to find a slight DNA damage, only on exfoliated buccal cells of day hospital nurses, the group handling the highest amount of drugs during the administration process. This finding suggests that comet assay on exfoliated buccal cells could represent a useful tool to evaluate early and still repairable genotoxic effects of exposure to antineoplastic drug mixtures and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2), although the tail moment tended to be larger in the nurses than in the controls. Similarly, Ursini et al 27) failed to find any significant difference in tail moment between healthcare workers and controls. In contrast, Kopjar and Garaj-Vrhovac showed that the tail moments in medical personnel handling antineoplastic drugs differed significantly from those in controls 24) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2), although the tail moment tended to be larger in the nurses than in the controls. Similarly, Ursini et al 27) failed to find any significant difference in tail moment between healthcare workers and controls. In contrast, Kopjar and Garaj-Vrhovac showed that the tail moments in medical personnel handling antineoplastic drugs differed significantly from those in controls 24) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The conclusions of these studies were often contradictory, probably because of uncertainties concerning exposure level 20) or because effective protective measures were differently adopted 21) . In a follow-up study of genotoxic hazards in pharmacists and nurses handling ANPDs carried out four years after a first study, the frequency of MN in the exposed nurses and control subjects was not found to be statistically different after improving working conditions 11) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A group of 76 healthy nonexposed subjects (30 relatives of the airport personnel, 16 relatives of paving workers, and 30 relatives of workers exposed to antineoplastic drugs) were used as controls. Data relative to each worker group and relative controls have been partially published in our previous studies [Cavallo et al, 2005[Cavallo et al, , 2006a[Cavallo et al, , 2006b[Cavallo et al, , 2007bUrsini et al, 2006]. The workers exposed to antineoplastic drugs (mean age 35.17 6 7.4) were employed in a large Italian oncology hospital with (1) a specialized pharmacy where antineoplastic drug mixtures were prepared and (2) a day hospital unit and oncology ward where the mixtures were administered by specially trained nurses.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a rapid, simple, and very sensitive test, which facilitates the evaluation of DNA damage and repair on single cells [Collins, 2004], and is one of the most used methods in biomonitoring studies of the genotoxic effects on blood lymphocytes [Maluf and Erdtmann, 2000;Faust et al, 2004;Cavallo et al, 2002aCavallo et al, , 2002bCavallo et al, , 2005Cavallo et al, , 2006aCavallo et al, , 2006bMoller, 2006, Speit andHartmann, 2006;Ursini et al, 2006]. The comet assay is able to sensitively reveal early, still repairable, moderate DNA damage, and can therefore furnish useful information on early effects induced by occupational exposure to low doses of xenobiotics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation