“…Autografts are regarded as the gold standard for repairing nerve defects in most clinical cases but suffer from several issues, including lack of host sources, potential cross-infection, requirements of additional surgery, lengthy operation times, as well as mismatches in donor–recipient nerve length/diameter. , Novel approaches for facial nerve defect repair with similar performance to autografts but fewer associated issues are therefore required . Artificial nerve conduits play an increasingly important role in nerve repair. , Many strategies have been adopted for the fabrication of effective nerve conduits, such as conditioning with bioactive molecules for release or development of biomimetic platforms. − However, while conduits are useful for bridging the defects, the functional regeneration is typically extremely limited . Therefore, various studies have strived to find suitable fillings for nerve conduits to improve the functional regeneration following nerve injuries, such as collagen fibers, phosphate-glass fiber bundles, agarose, spongy matrix, and scaffolds .…”