2015
DOI: 10.1002/ep.12184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of dual permeability of gas flow in municipal solid waste: Experiment and modeling

Abstract: Non‐homogeneity of permeability largely depends on heterogeneity of the pore structure of waste in a landfill, which contributes to variation in gas flow state. Gas pressure dropping test (GPDT) was one of the most effective methods to describe the gas preferential flow, was used to investigate the gas breakthrough curves in initial pressures, moisture contents and degradation phases in lab test. Dual‐permeability model was developed to quantify the gas preferential flow in waste column. The reliability of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figure shows that as the degradation time increased, the porosity and permeability of the waste decreased despite being under compression stress. The particle size was considerably smaller than that of Liu et al [21] because of the higher moisture content in this paper, which resulted in the MSW sample becoming more conducive to degradation. The decrease in porosity and permeability became more obvious when degradation time increased, which could be because of the reduction in pore size, change in geometry, and continuity of pores that resulted in the decrease in flow area.…”
Section: Effects Of Degradation On Permeability and Porositymentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The figure shows that as the degradation time increased, the porosity and permeability of the waste decreased despite being under compression stress. The particle size was considerably smaller than that of Liu et al [21] because of the higher moisture content in this paper, which resulted in the MSW sample becoming more conducive to degradation. The decrease in porosity and permeability became more obvious when degradation time increased, which could be because of the reduction in pore size, change in geometry, and continuity of pores that resulted in the decrease in flow area.…”
Section: Effects Of Degradation On Permeability and Porositymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Sample size was artificially broken to less than 4 cm. The anaerobic degradation operation was similar to that conducted by Liu et al [21]. Samples n1 to n3 discussed the influence of stress on the density and porosity of the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, preferential flow was apparent because of the obvious heterogeneities of the pore structure in the landfill body . However, the simplified SPM could not describe the process of gas preferential flow . In the present study, the effect of moisture content and biodegradation on preferential permeation was further analyzed through a gas pressure dropping test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Liu et al . (2016a,b) conducted an aeration test in a field site in the Yiling Landfill in China. The average injection rate of a single well in the initial phase was 82 m 3 /h.…”
Section: Operation Parameters Of Air Injection Wellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al . (2016a) preliminary testified the gas preferential flow in waste body based on the gas pressure dropping test and dual‐permeability model . Test result showed that the space of the matrix domain was vastly larger than the fracture domain.…”
Section: Issue and Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%