2003
DOI: 10.1081/ja-120024243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Drug Use Prevention Programs Directed at Adolescents

Abstract: The aim of this article is to present a theoretical model of how to undertake evaluations of prevention programs directed at adolescents. Based on the results from metaanalyses of outcome studies of school-based programs, this article concludes that interactive programs tend to be more effective than not only those mainly intended to increase factual knowledge about tobacco, alcohol, and illegal drugs, but also those initiatives aimed at influencing adolescents' attitudes toward those substances. The interacti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Prevention based awareness programs are important to decrease demand by informing students about the relative risks of dependence on various substances based on current knowledge of these risks. As the substance use usually begins after the age of 12 and rises with the increased age, therefore, the preventive substance use disorder education should begin in early adolescence which can deter or delay substance use through changes in knowledge, attitude, and behavior [26,27,28,29,30] Adolescent substance use education must meet the needs of those not taking any substance as well as those experiencing initial substance exposures. Education provided at early age is important in modifying students' responses in substance use situations and in the later age it is most meaningful [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prevention based awareness programs are important to decrease demand by informing students about the relative risks of dependence on various substances based on current knowledge of these risks. As the substance use usually begins after the age of 12 and rises with the increased age, therefore, the preventive substance use disorder education should begin in early adolescence which can deter or delay substance use through changes in knowledge, attitude, and behavior [26,27,28,29,30] Adolescent substance use education must meet the needs of those not taking any substance as well as those experiencing initial substance exposures. Education provided at early age is important in modifying students' responses in substance use situations and in the later age it is most meaningful [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education provided at early age is important in modifying students' responses in substance use situations and in the later age it is most meaningful [27]. Prevention programs should also be targeted to an individual's substance specific educational needs [26,28] Comprehensive approaches that address behavioral, emotional, and environmental factors are more effective in eliciting long term effects [26,27,28,29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the preventive drug education should begin in early adolescence and should deter or delay drug use through changes in knowledge, attitude, and behavior [15][16][17][18][19]. Adolescent drug education must meet the needs of those naive to drugs as well as those experiencing initial drug exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first element is a good program. The program should have the following attributes: well designed with clear goals; tailor made for adolescents' needs; socially and culturally sensitive; user friendly; with ready-made teaching materials; emphasis on practical competencies and generic skills; evidence-based program design; design conducive to the instructors' willingness to implement the program as intended, without overlapping with other existing programs in the school and with novel and attractive activities [12,16,17,18].…”
Section: Quality Of Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%