16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2013.6728583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of driving behavior and the efficacy of a predictive eco-driving assistance system for heavy commercial vehicles in a driving simulator experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be shown by means of an independent-samples t-test (t(6.2) = 4.019, p=0.007). Table 5 contains the results of the original model fitting of the linear mixed model (LMM) [11] as well as two refittings regarding the predictor System Experience. When replacing System Experience by SAS scores, model quality is improved (as AICc becomes smaller).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This can be shown by means of an independent-samples t-test (t(6.2) = 4.019, p=0.007). Table 5 contains the results of the original model fitting of the linear mixed model (LMM) [11] as well as two refittings regarding the predictor System Experience. When replacing System Experience by SAS scores, model quality is improved (as AICc becomes smaller).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing the estimations of the fixed-effect β, the original model assesses the learning effect due to System Experience a fuel consumption reduction of −1.04 L/ 100 km or −2.53 % compared to a run without EDAS (run 2) [11]. Using the SAS scores as predictor suggest an average fuel consumption reduction of 1.21·(−0.90) L/100 km=−1.09 L/100 km or −2.67 % for those subjects answering with Byes^on the judgment of learning and an increase of 0.4 L/100 km (0.97 %) for the subjects answering in the negative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations