2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of drag correlations using particle resolved simulations of spheres and ellipsoids in assembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the traditional approach under‐predicts the drag force by 26–66% for various solid volume fractions. It is noted that the large deviation between results from the traditional approach and that from PR‐DNSs has also been reported by He et al They found that the correlation combining Di Felice's voidage correction factor and the model by Holzer and Sommerfeld under‐predicts the drag force by 23–44% at solid volume fractions ranging from 0.1 to 0.35 when the Reynolds number and the aspect ratio are 10 and 5/2, respectively. They also pointed out that this deviation would decrease with the increase of the Reynolds number, suggesting that the traditional drag model for ellipsoids may have better performance at moderate and high Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the traditional approach under‐predicts the drag force by 26–66% for various solid volume fractions. It is noted that the large deviation between results from the traditional approach and that from PR‐DNSs has also been reported by He et al They found that the correlation combining Di Felice's voidage correction factor and the model by Holzer and Sommerfeld under‐predicts the drag force by 23–44% at solid volume fractions ranging from 0.1 to 0.35 when the Reynolds number and the aspect ratio are 10 and 5/2, respectively. They also pointed out that this deviation would decrease with the increase of the Reynolds number, suggesting that the traditional drag model for ellipsoids may have better performance at moderate and high Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, the validity of this method has not been comprehensively assessed using results from experiments or direct numerical simulations. Using the immersed boundary method, He et al computed the mean drag force on random assemblies of ellipsoids with different solid volume fractions from 0.1 to 0.35 at low to moderate Reynolds numbers. They compared their results with the correlation obtained by combining single nonspherical particle drag models and the voidage correction factor from Wen and Yu model as well as Di Felice model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gurubasavaraju等人 [62] 采用CFD方法模拟了磁流变液 阻尼器在不同电流、不同频率下的响应, 计算与实验 相符. 特别地, He等人 [63] 采用CFD方法研究不同形 状、不同质量分数的颗粒的流动阻力系数, 为颗粒动 力学模拟提供理论基础.…”
Section: 指出 成链过程由颗粒体积分数主导 磁场力模型的unclassified
“…Besides computer game and movie industry, PhysX has been extensively used as a powerful scientific simulation tool in many disciplines, including robotic control 41,42 , granular materials [43][44][45] , structural engineering 46 , construction engineering [47][48][49] , crowd simulation 50 , biomedical engineering 51,52 , autonomous vehicle research 53 , virtual and augmented reality 54 , and psychological research 55 .…”
Section: Introduce To Physics Engine Techniques and Physxmentioning
confidence: 99%