2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00231-014-1404-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of distributed parameters mathematical models applied to grain hydration with volume change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The behaviour of D0 with the temperature was in line with that which was found in the present work (D0 increases exponentially as a function of the temperature). As for the behaviour of k1 obtained in this work, it was the opposite from what was presented by Nicolin et al (k1 increased as a function of the temperature in the work aforementioned). The lack of a physical foundation for the description of the radius as a function of time may be associated to the inversion of k1 behaviour with the temperature.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The behaviour of D0 with the temperature was in line with that which was found in the present work (D0 increases exponentially as a function of the temperature). As for the behaviour of k1 obtained in this work, it was the opposite from what was presented by Nicolin et al (k1 increased as a function of the temperature in the work aforementioned). The lack of a physical foundation for the description of the radius as a function of time may be associated to the inversion of k1 behaviour with the temperature.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Table compares values of D0 and k1 obtained in this work and obtained for a similar model, developed by Nicolin et al In their work, Nicolin et al made use of the same model, but they took into consideration the grain radius variation, and included in the model an equation of R(t) formerly known, which was fitted to the experimental data. Nevertheless, this equation is purely empirical, without any grounds in physics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations