Evaluation of disk position and prevalence of internal derangement, in a sample of the elderly, by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Schmitter, Marc; Rammelsberg, Peter; Hassel, Alexander J.; Schröeder, Johannes; Seneadza, Viktoria; Balke, Z.; Essig, Marco

doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.01.031

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3 The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/ TMD) has been tested for reliability and validity for both Axes I and II with good to excellent results, particularly when recalibrated examiners have been used, even when compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard for TMJ disc displacement. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The RDC/TMD has been translated and validated in many different languages, including Brazilian Portuguese, to assess the prevalence of TMD from a global perspective. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Nevertheless, the prevalence of TMD at the population level is still questionable due to the employment of different methodologies.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders in an Adult Brazilian Community Population Using the Research Diagnostic Criteria (Axes I and II) for Temporomandibular Disorders (The Maringá Study)

Progiante¹,

Pattussi²,

Lawrence³

et al. 2015

Int J Prosthodont

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and comorbid factors (sleep bruxism and headaches). This study was a cross-sectional population survey in the city of Maringá, state of Paraná, Brazil. Materials and Methods: Axes I and II of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) were used for assessment of TMD signs and symptoms. The population was users of the Brazilian public health system (SUS), of both sexes, between the ages of 20 and 65 years, and not seeking treatment for TMD. Results: The selected population (N = 1,643) was composed mostly of (a) women (65.9%), (b) married or single individuals (90.6%), (c) Caucasians (70.1%), (d) individuals aged 32.7 ± 10.3 years, (e) individuals earning a medium income (75.1%), and (f) those who had completed a high school education or higher (79.9%). According to the chronic pain grade classification (CPG) in the RDC/TMD Axis II, 36.2% of the population had some degree of TMD pain (CPG I to IV); however, only 5.1% had severe limitation due to pain (CPG III or IV). In the RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses, 29.5% presented with muscle disorders (group I), 7.9% with disk displacements (group II), and 39.1% with other joint disorders (group III). Headaches were present in 67.9% and awake and sleep bruxism in 30% and 33.4% of the population, respectively. Conclusion: The prevalence of signs and symptoms of TMD was high in this population, but with low disability; however, the proportion of patients in need of treatment was much lower.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders in an Adult Brazilian Community Population Using the Research Diagnostic Criteria (Axes I and II) for Temporomandibular Disorders (The Maringá Study)

Progiante¹,

Pattussi²,

Lawrence³

et al. 2015

Int J Prosthodont

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For 30 participants of the ILSE, these degenerative alterations were verified by using MR images in an earlier follow‐up assessment. In MR images, 70% of the investigated joints showed radiological signs of DJD and 27% of DD 24,25 . The smaller prevalence of TMJ‐related RDC/TMD diagnoses in the present study might be due to the moderate reliability of detecting TMJ sounds and the diagnostic algorithms of the RDC/TMD 26,27 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 53%

“…In MR images, 70% of the investigated joints showed radiological signs of DJD and 27% of DD. 24,25 The smaller prevalence of TMJ-related RDC/TMD diagnoses in the present study might be due to the moderate reliability of detecting TMJ sounds and the diagnostic algorithms of the RDC/TMD. 26,27 However, the observed co-existence of diagnoses DD and DJD is typical in older people and has already been described in the literature with an odds ratio of 2.9.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 67%

Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and bruxism in seniors

Rauch

Nitschke

Hahnel

et al. 2023

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Information on the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) or possible/probable bruxism in seniors is heterogeneous and sparse. Objectives: To elucidate the prevalence of TMD and possible/probable bruxism in German adults aged 60 years and older. Methods: Participants of the Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study of Adult Development and Aging (ILSE) born between 1950-1952 (C1) and 1930-1932 (C2) were examined in 2014-2016 (fourth wave). The participants were surveyed and clinically examined by one calibrated examiner. Two questions of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) were utilised to evaluate self-reported bruxism. The clinical examination included signs of probable bruxism and the RDC/TMD examination protocol.Results: Data from 191 participants were available. No RDC/TMD diagnosis was made in 83.2%. Of the participants, 15.2% received a single diagnosis and 1.6% multiple diagnoses that included disc displacements (9.4%) and degenerative joint diseases (8.9%). A total of 24.7% reported bruxism that included self-reported awake bruxism in 11.9% and sleep bruxism in 16.2%. Wear was clinically identified in 27.2% of the participants. No sex-related differences were observed. Significant differences were detected for probable bruxism between C1 (14.1%) and C2 (54.3%). Conclusion:In the German population aged 60 years and older, the prevalence of TMD is 16.8%. TMD is characterised by temporomandibular joint disorders, including disc displacements and degenerative joint disorders. Bruxism was observed in a quarter of the old population.

show abstract

“…With the advent of MR imaging, investigators began to study the TMJs of random asymptomatic volunteers and found that 23-35% of these subjects had displaced discs [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. This was analogous to studies of intervertebral disc displacement in asymptomatic low back pain subjects [27,28].…”

Section: Problem #4mentioning

confidence: 99%

Temporomandibular Joint Facts and Foibles

Mercuri

2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to dispel some of the major foibles associated with the etiology and management of TMJ disorders, while presenting some of the facts based on the scientific literature to date. To appreciate this kind of update, the reader must be an “out of the box thinker” which requires openness to new ways of seeing the world and a willingness to accept new concepts based on evolving evidence.

show abstract

Evaluation of disk position and prevalence of internal derangement, in a sample of the elderly, by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Cited by 8 publications

References 29 publications

Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders in an Adult Brazilian Community Population Using the Research Diagnostic Criteria (Axes I and II) for Temporomandibular Disorders (The Maringá Study)

Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders in an Adult Brazilian Community Population Using the Research Diagnostic Criteria (Axes I and II) for Temporomandibular Disorders (The Maringá Study)

Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and bruxism in seniors

Temporomandibular Joint Facts and Foibles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About