2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of disease staging and chemotherapeutic response in non-small cell lung cancer from patient tumor-derived metabolomic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collaborative design of the APF-bowl&0.96Au submicroreactor was also critical to extracting the SMFs efficiently, enabling the revelation of metabolic differences during chemotherapy. In addition, the sample size of this study (243 samples) was comparable with that of previous literature (∼30–200 samples). ,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The collaborative design of the APF-bowl&0.96Au submicroreactor was also critical to extracting the SMFs efficiently, enabling the revelation of metabolic differences during chemotherapy. In addition, the sample size of this study (243 samples) was comparable with that of previous literature (∼30–200 samples). ,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, the sample size of this study (243 samples) was comparable with that of previous literature (∼30–200 samples). 9 , 50 , 51 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the majority misjudgment carries a bigger weight than the minority, miss judgment is more likely to occur for the majority than for the minority. Classification algorithms that rely on traditional methods of doing things do not perform as well as they could [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any measurements still missing were handled similar to baseline data. The pre-specified endpoint for this study was progression to ≥CPG3 disease which we have previously reported as a clinically meaningful exit criterion and consistent with NICE recommendations 10 . Progression to CPG3 + is possible through a rise in PSA, change in histological Grade Group (e.g., an increase from Grade Group 2 to Grade Group 3) or change in stage of tumour (e.g., T2 to T3) as shown in Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 62%