2020
DOI: 10.33899/rden.2020.166475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Different Zirconia Surface Treatments on their Microhardness

Abstract: Aims: To investigate the effect of mechanical and chemical surface treatments including (AL 2 O 3-110µm) and citric acid solution (30%) on the microhardness of zirconia ceramic. Materials and Methods: Twenty four cubic shaped specimens were prepared from partial sintering zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD MT).Specimens were randomly assigned into three main groups (GI, GII, and GIII) according to the surface treatment methods (n=8). Group I: zirconia surface left without surface treatment (control), Group II: In this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Z-Prime group had an insignificantly lower hardness value than the sintered group, which might be attributed to the chemistry of the carboxylic monomers that contained conventional MDP. The sandblasted group had a significantly higher hardness value than all other groups; this might be attributed to the precipitation of Al 2 O 3 particles within the abraded surface, as confirmed by the EDS chemical analysis results ( Table 2 ), or could be due to the stress-induced transformation from the tetragonal to the monoclinic crystal phase, accompanied by an increase of the strength property [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Z-Prime group had an insignificantly lower hardness value than the sintered group, which might be attributed to the chemistry of the carboxylic monomers that contained conventional MDP. The sandblasted group had a significantly higher hardness value than all other groups; this might be attributed to the precipitation of Al 2 O 3 particles within the abraded surface, as confirmed by the EDS chemical analysis results ( Table 2 ), or could be due to the stress-induced transformation from the tetragonal to the monoclinic crystal phase, accompanied by an increase of the strength property [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In our study, a silica–calcium-rich layer with an average particle size of 0.224 μm was formed on the zirconia substrate as a glass surface layer. The bioglass surface layer was homogenous, even, and intact, with no cracks or defects [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%