1981
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(81)90311-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of different methods for detecting circulating immune complexes. Studies in patients with lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the heterogeneity of CICs, parallel application of methods based on different principles may be a useful approach [6,8,11,131. Collective experience in the measurement of CIC has shown that no single method is ideal in all circumstances and that valuable information can be derived from the use of two or more test systems [13,22,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the heterogeneity of CICs, parallel application of methods based on different principles may be a useful approach [6,8,11,131. Collective experience in the measurement of CIC has shown that no single method is ideal in all circumstances and that valuable information can be derived from the use of two or more test systems [13,22,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes the clinical usefulness of determining CIC in malignant diseases doubtful. A comparison of various methods quantifying reference preparations of aggregated immunoglobulins showed a good correlation between some of these tests, however [3,5,6,8,9,13]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of tests (24) including several solidphase enzyme immunoassays (2,3,15,18,19,22) have been devised for the detection of CIC. However, when different assays are compared, the correlation among the results is rather poor (5,6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some tests, proper standard curves cannot be constructed, while others discriminate poorly between patient and control series (1 2). Frequently, there is a lack of correlation among different tests (6,26), and in most assays, several factors may interfere with the results and provide false positive or false negative results (16,25,27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%