2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1173-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of different diagnostic methods for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in boot swabs and liquid manure samples

Abstract: BackgroundEnvironmental sampling based on boot swabs and/or liquid manure samples is an upcoming strategy for the identification of paratuberculosis (paraTB) positive herds, but only limited data are available regarding the diagnostic performance of molecular detection methods (qPCR) versus faecal culture (FC) for this purpose. In the present study, the test characteristics of two different qPCR protocols (A and B) and a standardized FC protocol, for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental sampling and assessment protocols for MAP detection has been developed [ 53 , 54 ]). Other recent, MAP studies related to environments include environmental detection of MAP in some matrices such as drylot pens, dairy herds’ paddock, milking facilities, anaerobic digestion of slurry from MAP-infected farm, manure storage, lactating cow surroundings, housing (freestall, loose housing, or tiestall), liquid manure and boot swabs [ 18 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental sampling and assessment protocols for MAP detection has been developed [ 53 , 54 ]). Other recent, MAP studies related to environments include environmental detection of MAP in some matrices such as drylot pens, dairy herds’ paddock, milking facilities, anaerobic digestion of slurry from MAP-infected farm, manure storage, lactating cow surroundings, housing (freestall, loose housing, or tiestall), liquid manure and boot swabs [ 18 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, we did not include environmental sampling in the present work, as it will be the subject of a separate piece of work within the same project. The use of environmental testing to identify the presence of MAP has been increasingly investigated in recent years (Lavers et al, 2013;Hahn et al, 2017) and could contribute to more cost-effective testing strategies when combined with traditional serum or milk sampling activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field cultures were obtained from the mycobacteria collections of the Hessian State Laboratory, Giessen, Germany. They were collected in the course of voluntary MAP surveillance programmes in three German federal states (Hesse, Thuringia and Saxony; Eisenberg et al 2013;Donat et al 2016;Hahn et al 2017). The respective cultures were primarily cultivated on Herrold's egg yolk medium (HEYM) agar slants supplemented with mycobactin J (MJ; HEYM-MJ; BD, Heidelberg, Germany) using faecal or environmental samples originating from dairy herds (n = 81), where growth was observed within 6-8 weeks.…”
Section: Map Strains/culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%