Evaluation of different diagnostic criteria of diseases manifesting the oral cavity – A review. Part-1

Shivhare, Peeyush; Gupta, Amod; Yadav, Monu; Konidena, Aravinda; Shankarnarayan, Lata

doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.12.012

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The study consisted of retrospectively reviewed cases of histopathologically diagnosed OLP according to the modified WHO criteria[ 10 ] [ Table 1 ] from the archived records of the patients in the Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha. Figures 1 and 2 show classical histopathological features required to diagnose OLP as per the modified WHO criteria.…”

Section: Aterials and M Ethodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinicopathological profile and malignant transformation in oral lichen planus: A retrospective study

Bandyopadhyay

Nishat

Dash

et al. 2017

J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Aterials and M Ethodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinicopathological profile and malignant transformation in oral lichen planus: A retrospective study

Bandyopadhyay

Nishat

Dash

et al. 2017

J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…OLP is a chronic inflammatory disease of autoimmune origin, mediated by T lymphocytes, which affects stratified squamous epithelial tissue; however, etiology and pathogenesis are not completely known [ 5 ]. Oral manifestations typically include hyperkeratotic striation/reticulation and/or a variable degree of erythema, blistering, erosion, and ulceration [ 6 ] and the most commonly affected sites in the oral cavity are the buccal mucosa, tongue, and gingiva [ 7 , 8 ]. In turn, MMP is a group of chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated sub-epithelial bullous diseases, which manifest a heterogeneous pattern of oral, ocular, cutaneous, genital, nasopharyngeal, esophageal, and laryngeal lesions [ 9 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Photobiomodulation of gingival lesions resulting from autoimmune diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To evaluate the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) in gingival lesions resulting from autoimmune diseases; to compare PBM and topical corticosteroid (CS) treatment; and to assess PBM outcome over time of follow-up. Materials and methods A comprehensive electronic search was performed in four electronic databases. Treatment effects were measured through visual analog scale of pain (VAS) and clinical evolution of lesion (Thongprasom scale for oral lichen planus (OLP)). Meta-analysis was performed to compare PBM with topical corticosteroid treatment and to evaluate PBM effect over time of follow-up. Results Seventeen studies were included in this review, of which six were used for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed no significant differences between PBM and topical CS in pain reduction at baseline (MD = 0.20, 95% CI = − 0.92, 1.32, p = 0.72) and 60-day follow-up (MD = 0.63, 95% CI = − 3.93, 5.19, p = 0.79); however, VAS showed significant pain reduction when compared before and after PBM at 30-day (MD = − 3.52, 95% CI = − 5.40, − 1.64, p = 0.0002) and 60-day (MD = − 5.04, 95% CI = − 5.86, − 4.22, p < 0.00001) follow-up. Thongprasom clinical scale for OLP also showed significant improvement at 30-day follow-up (MD = − 2.50, 95% CI = − 2.92, − 2.08, p < 0.00001) after PBM. Conclusion PBM led to significant reduction of pain and clinical scores of the lesions, not having shown significant differences when compared to topical CS. Clinical relevance PBM has been used in the treatment of autoimmune gingival lesions, but so far there is little strong evidence to support its use.

show abstract

“…El conocimiento de las patologías en la mucosa oral y su correcto diagnóstico son aspectos fundamentales en el área de odontología (1-2), ya que estudios han demostrado que los odontólogos fracasan en detectar o identificar este tipo de lesiones, especialmente el cáncer bucal, ello debido, no solo a falta de conocimientos (1), sino también a la variabilidad de una enfermedad (3). Es importante destacar que la biopsia y el estudio histopatológico respectivo son esenciales para la definición del diagnóstico y así, determinar la conducta a seguir (4), lo cual va acompañado del análisis de los datos clínicos del paciente, pues se ha demostrado que algunos factores como la edad (2,5), sexo (2), estado socioeconómico (2,5), grupo étnico (2), condiciones ambientales, uso de prótesis, hábitos de tabaquismo y alcoholismo (5), pueden estar asociados con la presencia de lesiones bucales (5), y así lo subrayan Forman y cols., quienes indican que variables específicas del paciente pueden resultar en una alta proporción de discrepancia entre los diagnósticos clínico e histopatológico (6).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Concordancia del diagnóstico clínico y el diagnóstico histopatológico de lesiones en tejidos blandos de cavidad oral.

Navas-Aparicio

Rivera

2021

Rev Biomed

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introducción: En la literatura se evidencia que existe discrepancia entre el diagnóstico clínico e histopatológico de lesiones de mucosa oral, lo que puede deberse a la falta de conocimientos de los profesionales, a la variabilidad de una enfermedad y a variables específicas del paciente.Objetivo: Determinar el grado de concordancia existente entre el diagnóstico clínico e histopatológico de lesiones en tejidos blandos en cavidad oral, en la Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Costa Rica, durante el período 2016-2018.Material y métodos: El estudio se basó en analizar la correlación entre el diagnóstico clínico e histopatológico de lesiones de tejidos blandos en la cavidad oral, en un grupo de 35 pacientes. La técnica estadística fue descriptiva, utilizando la media y la medida de dispersión de rango, basada en una distribución de frecuencias, y en el análisis de concordancia entre ambos diagnósticos, según los datos obtenidos.Resultados: La muestra total fue de 40 lesiones, de las cuales se excluyeron 2. El sexo femenino predominó en el estudio en un 57.1%. El promedio de edad fue 52,1 años. La correlación del diagnóstico clínico e histológico en el estudio fue de 52.6%; siendo mayor el porcentaje de acierto en lesiones de hiperplasia fibrosa focal.Conclusiones: A pesar de que hubo una correlación del diagnóstico clínico e histopatológico de 52.6%, es fundamental reforzar, las destrezas y habilidades del profesional para distinguir las lesiones de mucosa oral con el fin de alcanzar un diagnóstico definitivo, definir un tratamiento y dar el seguimiento respectivo.Palabras clave: mucosa oral, diagnóstico oral, patología oral, histopatologíaConcordance of the clinical diagnosis and the histopathological diagnosis of soft tissue lesions of the oral cavity.Introduction: The literature shows that there is a discrepancy between the clinical and histopathological diagnosis of oral mucosa lesions, which may be due to the lack of knowledge of professionals, the variability of a disease and specific patient variables.Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of concordance between the clinical and histopathological diagnosis of soft tissue lesions in the oral cavity, at the Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Costa Rica, during the period 2016-2018.Material and methods: The study was based on analyzing the correlation between the clinical and histopathological diagnosis of soft tissue lesions in the oral cavity, in a group of 35 patients. The statistical technique was descriptive, using the mean and the measure of range dispersion, based on a distribution of frequencies, and in the analysis of concordance between both diagnoses, according to the data obtained.Results: The total sample was 40 lesions, of which 2 were excluded. The female sex predominated in the study in 57.1%. The average age was 52.1 years. The correlation of the clinical and histological diagnosis in the study was 52.6%; being higher the percentage of success in focal fibrous hyperplasia lesions.Conclusions: Although there was a correlation of clinical and histopathological diagnosis of 52.6%, it is essential to reinforce the professional skills and abilities to distinguish oral mucosa lesions in order to reach a definitive diagnosis, define a treatment and give the respective monitoring.Key words: oral mucosa, oral diagnosis, oral pathology, histopathology

show abstract

Evaluation of different diagnostic criteria of diseases manifesting the oral cavity – A review. Part-1

Cited by 11 publications

References 36 publications

Clinicopathological profile and malignant transformation in oral lichen planus: A retrospective study

Clinicopathological profile and malignant transformation in oral lichen planus: A retrospective study

Photobiomodulation of gingival lesions resulting from autoimmune diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis

Concordancia del diagnóstico clínico y el diagnóstico histopatológico de lesiones en tejidos blandos de cavidad oral.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About