2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of different carbon and nitrogen sources in production of biosurfactant by Pseudomonas fluorescens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

14
172
3
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
14
172
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, biosurfactant produced in SmF had the highest E 24 and E 48 values, despite reducing surface tension to levels lower than SSF (with and without shaking). In the study of Abouseoud et al (2008), biosurfactants produced by P. fluorescens with 3 different carbon sources (hexadecane, olive oil, and glucose) had much the same surface tension value, although E 24 values showed changes. According to these results, it can be deduced that surface tension and emulsification index are based on growth medium components and growth condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, biosurfactant produced in SmF had the highest E 24 and E 48 values, despite reducing surface tension to levels lower than SSF (with and without shaking). In the study of Abouseoud et al (2008), biosurfactants produced by P. fluorescens with 3 different carbon sources (hexadecane, olive oil, and glucose) had much the same surface tension value, although E 24 values showed changes. According to these results, it can be deduced that surface tension and emulsification index are based on growth medium components and growth condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biosurfactants have recently received much more attention due to their potential to become an environment-friendly alternative to conventional synthetic surfactants. Advantages of biosurfactants over their synthetic counterparts include lower toxicity, biodegradability, better environmental compatibility, higher foaming, high selectivity, and specific activity at extreme temperatures, pH and salinity (Desai and Banat, 1997;Makkar and Cameotra, 1999;Makkar and Cameotra, 2002;Ilori et al, 2005;Raza et al, 2007;Abouseoud et al, 2008;Fontes et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biosurfactants are a leading group of valuable microbial natural products with unique biochemical properties. From a biotechnology prospective, the production of biosurfactants is important owing to their vast applications in food, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and the agricultural and petrochemical industries (Robert et al, 1989;Pruthi and Cameotra, 2003;Abouseoud et al, 2008;Nguyen et al, 2008). They are interesting amphiphilic biomacromolecules with various biological functions/ properties such as; enhancer of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon bioavailability to microorganisms and, accordingly, their biodegradation, reducer of the interfacial tension by partitioning preferentially at interfaces, effective activity on surfaces, oil recovery, and so on (Desai and Banat, 1997;Pruthi and Cameotra, 2003;Joshi et al, 2008;Nguyen et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, olive oil was found the best carbon source for the biosurfactant production. Pseudomonas fluorescens Migula 1895-DSMZ was reported to produce rhamnolipid biosurfactant with the highest yield when olive oil used as a carbon source [44]. Plant-derived oils have been documented as an excellent carbon substrates for biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa [45,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%