2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of different buffered peptone water (BPW) based enrichment broths for detection of Gram-negative foodborne pathogens from various food matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in difficulty in the detection of pathogens using either molecular-based or culture-based methods without a pre-enrichment step (Baylis et al, 2000; Margot et al, 2015). Most of the bacteria in marketed foods are usually in an injured/stressed state, and some are in a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state due to heat, radiation, or low temperature treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in difficulty in the detection of pathogens using either molecular-based or culture-based methods without a pre-enrichment step (Baylis et al, 2000; Margot et al, 2015). Most of the bacteria in marketed foods are usually in an injured/stressed state, and some are in a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state due to heat, radiation, or low temperature treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the observation that EE-broth favours enrichment of the phylum Proteobacteria including pathogens such as STEC and Salmonella should be a desirable trait of this media, we have also previously observed that the growth of STEC spiked into mungo bean sprouts terminates prematurely thereby hindering their detection in contaminated sprouts [12]. Based on this, we concluded that this was probably due to competition and outgrowth of the STEC by non-target enterobacteria species that occur at high abundances within the mungo bean sprout background flora.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to different factors such as competition with co-enriching sprout microflora, as well as differences in growth rates and presence of growth inhibitors, this enrichment does result in a biased sample [11]. In the case of sprouted seeds deliberately contaminated with STEC, we recently showed that growth of the target organisms terminates prematurely and PCR cannot reliably detect its presence even at high contamination levels [12]. Furthermore, attempts to increase the selectivity of the enrichment using different media or selective supplements did not have a significant impact on reducing the levels of co-enriching sprout background flora during enrichment [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food samples (25 g or 25 mL) were screened for S . aureus by transferring to 225 mL of buffered peptone water and mixed thoroughly 43 . The samples were incubated overnight at 37 °C for enrichment of cultures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%