Evaluation of Diesel Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Characteristics Using Waste Cooking Oil

Ramlan, Nur Atiqah; Abdullah, Abdul Adam; Hamzah, Mohd Herzwan; Jaharudin, Nur Fauziah; Mamat, Rizalman

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.773-774.425

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The result of experiment proved that combustion of B5 and B20 of biodiesel of waste cooking oil was same with diesel in the in the cylinder combustion pressure. Due to its properties B100 shows a large difference with diesel [7]. By using NOME (Neem Oil methyl ester) blend B20, B30 and diesel are 28.32%, 27.69% and 26.74% respectively at full load condition of brake thermal efficiency of IC engine.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance and Emission Parameters of Compression-Ignition (Ci) Engine Fuelled with Waste or used Temple Oil Biodiesel at Blends

Saddu¹,

Kivade²,

Devarahalli³

2018

Int J Appl Sci Res Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The biodiesel as a renewable fuel has been recognized as one of the best alternative fuel for diesel engine in the present world. Ignition pressure is the major influencing parameter for the performance and emission of diesel engine. Biodiesel from Waste or Used Temple Oil is mainly obtained cheaply from transesterification process as compared to biodiesel produced from various resources. Due to many mythological and religious beliefs thousands of devotees pour oil over the idols in many temples in India, such as Hanuman and Shani temples. Most of the poured oil of the temples wasted. In this study the investigation of performance and combustion characteristics of biodiesel of Used Temple Oil is focused with different blends of biodiesel like B100, B40, B30 and B20 in Compression ignition engine, operating at injection opening pressure (IOP) of 200bar.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance and Emission Parameters of Compression-Ignition (Ci) Engine Fuelled with Waste or used Temple Oil Biodiesel at Blends

Saddu¹,

Kivade²,

Devarahalli³

2018

Int J Appl Sci Res Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This change in the mapping made the power produced with the B30 very similar to that of B10 in its original condition. The injection point advance is shown to be more effective with higher percentages of biodiesel, since the rate of heat release during combustion is lower as the amount of biodiesel blended increases (Ramlan et al, 2015). The hourly fuel consumption presented very similar values for the condition with original injection mapping and the advance injection point (+P) condition because there is no variation in the total nozzle opening time, only an advance of the opening and closing (Table 3).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 91%

Performance of a diesel engine using different biodiesel blends and injection configurations

Sala

Schlosser

Bertollo

et al. 2023

Rev. bras. eng. agríc. ambient.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diesel cycle engines are widely used in a wide range of agricultural activities. Recently, with the increasing use of biodiesel mixed with petroleum diesel and the introduction of pollutant emission regulations for agricultural and road machinery, there has been a growing migration from mechanical to electronic fuel injection systems. In this experiment, the primary aim was to verify the behavior of a diesel engine, electronically managed, with controlled variation of the fuel feeding system parameters (injection time and volume injected). A four-cylinder agricultural tractor with a turbocharged engine and a common rail electronic fuel injection system was used. Tests with diesel B10 and blends of 20 and 30% biodiesel were carried out, all with 10 ppm of sulfur and the injection system electronically reprogrammed. The tests were performed under full engine load from 1,300 to 2,000 rpm. The torque, power and fuel consumption were evaluated. Advancing the injection point increased the power and decreased the specific fuel consumption for all fuels. The greater amount of injected fuel provided average power gain of up to 14.96% and average torque gain of 15.50%.

show abstract

“…Additionally, diesel engines have long been renowned for their dependability and low fuel consumption. Even though diesel engines are preferred, they emit harmful exhaust emissions, particularly Particulate Matter (PM), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) [5][6][7][8]. It has recently come to light that emulsion fuel from water in-diesel (W/D) is one of the alternative fuels which most common with researchers because it offers a solution for the worldwide need to minimize NOx and PM emissions while also improving combustion efficiency and has received a lot of attention as a potential improvement on the environment and human health [9,10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Diesel Engine Performance between a Mechanical Pump and a Common Rail Fuel Injection System Equipped with Real-Time Non-Surfactant Emulsion Fuel Supply System

Rahman

Yahya

Kadir

et al. 2022

ARFMTS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global focus in emulsion fuels is due to the advantages over conventional diesel fuels. It has the capabilities to simultaneously reduce the emissions of NOx and smoke. It also said to reduce the fuel consumption of diesel engine by significant percentages. However, due to the interdependency on surfactant, emulsion fuel does not seem to be possible as alternative fuel in an economic perspective. This is because of the high market price of the commercial surfactant. Therefore, this research focused on non-surfactant W/D that produced by a system known as Real-Time Non-Surfactant Emulsion Fuel Supply System (RTES). RTES has been applied with the goal of investigating the impact on exhaust emissions and fuel consumption of a mechanical pump fuel injection system diesel vehicle (MP) and a common rail fuel injection system diesel vehicle (CR). A one-ton truck represents as MP (Mechanical Pump) and an SUV represent as CR (Common rail) are the test vehicles for the said research. The non-surfactant W/D with 6.5 wt.% of water produced by the RTES used as the test fuel and named as E6.5. It has been emulsified in the RTES right before being injected into the diesel vehicles. The testing was performed on a chassis dynamometer following the West Virginia University 5-peak cycles. The findings show that the utilization of non-surfactant W/D has increased the fuel consumption by 7.39% for MP and 3.2% for CR respectively as compared with base diesel fuel. NOx, smoke emissions and exhaust temperature have significantly reduced by the MP relative to CR vehicles. Overall, the concept of non-surfactant W/D seems to have implementation potential for reducing harmful emissions from both diesel-powered vehicles.

show abstract

Evaluation of Diesel Engine Performance and Exhaust Emission Characteristics Using Waste Cooking Oil

Cited by 7 publications

References 11 publications

Performance and Emission Parameters of Compression-Ignition (Ci) Engine Fuelled with Waste or used Temple Oil Biodiesel at Blends

Performance and Emission Parameters of Compression-Ignition (Ci) Engine Fuelled with Waste or used Temple Oil Biodiesel at Blends

Performance of a diesel engine using different biodiesel blends and injection configurations

Comparison of Diesel Engine Performance between a Mechanical Pump and a Common Rail Fuel Injection System Equipped with Real-Time Non-Surfactant Emulsion Fuel Supply System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About