1950
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<143::aid-cncr2820030119>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cancer.I. Methodology of evaluation and review of suggested diagnostic procedures

Abstract: False facts are highly injurious to the progress of science, for they often endure long; but false views, if supported by some evidence, do little harm, for everyone takes salutary pleasure in proving them wrong. DARWIN: The Descent of Man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 98 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At national level, the test was not used outside the IEM, while at international level its value became scrutinized along with those of other cancerologists whose tests lacked specificity and sensitivity. In a thorough review of the value of diagnostic tests published in 1950, the American-based oncologist Freddy Homburger considered quite categorically that Roffo’s reaction «has been the subject of considerable controversy, since most authors who did not belong to Roffo’s Institute obtained inconclusive results, although Roffo’s pupils accumulated thousands of correctly positive tests» 45 .…”
Section: Technology and The Control Of Cancer Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At national level, the test was not used outside the IEM, while at international level its value became scrutinized along with those of other cancerologists whose tests lacked specificity and sensitivity. In a thorough review of the value of diagnostic tests published in 1950, the American-based oncologist Freddy Homburger considered quite categorically that Roffo’s reaction «has been the subject of considerable controversy, since most authors who did not belong to Roffo’s Institute obtained inconclusive results, although Roffo’s pupils accumulated thousands of correctly positive tests» 45 .…”
Section: Technology and The Control Of Cancer Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%