2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MedCalc program was used to obtain AUCs. Youden’s index was used to identify the optimal cut-off point, calculated based on each IR surrogate’s corresponding sensitivity and specificity ( Barrett & Fardy, 2021 ). The level of statistical significance was accepted at the two-sided 0.05 level, and the confidence interval (CI) was determined at the 95% level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MedCalc program was used to obtain AUCs. Youden’s index was used to identify the optimal cut-off point, calculated based on each IR surrogate’s corresponding sensitivity and specificity ( Barrett & Fardy, 2021 ). The level of statistical significance was accepted at the two-sided 0.05 level, and the confidence interval (CI) was determined at the 95% level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant differences in the SII between IDs patients and healthy controls and between IDs patients with active disease and remissions reported in this systematic review and meta-analysis suggests the potential clinical utility of the SII as a diagnostic biomarker of IDs. The capacity of the SII to discriminate between different groups was considered excellent for the presence of IDs (pooled AUC = 0.85) and acceptable for the presence of active disease (pooled AUC = 0.74) [ 58 , 59 ]. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of the results of the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this approach to the effectiveness of BP measurement methods has not been studied, as researchers have prioritized cost-effectiveness ( 18 ). The evaluation of diagnostic methods often stops after quantifying the accuracy of the method compared with the gold-standard test ( 36 ). However, in the diagnosis of hypertension, BP measurement is linked to the patient experience and direct and indirect patient costs ( 37 ), and, therefore, incorporating the patient experience within the cost-accuracy framework is relevant in the evaluation of replacing OBPM by 1 h-AOBP in daily clinical practice: 1 h-AOBP favors the three domains (cost, patient outcomes and diagnostic accuracy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%