2005
DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200510000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of delayed additional FDG PET imaging in patients with pancreatic tumour

Abstract: The RI values obtained using early and delayed FDG PET may help in evaluating pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, addition of delayed FDG PET imaging is helpful to identify more lesions in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The retention index (RI) is defined as the difference in standardized uptake value between early and late imaging expressed as a percentage of the initial uptake (RI= (SUV delayed − SUV early )/SUV early × 100%). These reports have generally been favorable showing improvement in detection or contrast for brain [2], breast [3], lung [4], pancreas [5][6][7], gallbladder [8], hepatocellular [9], cervical [10,11], intra-abdominal [12], intra-thoracic [13], soft-tissue [14], and other tumors [15,16]. For nasopharyngeal carcinoma, high sensitivity did not improve with delayed imaging [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retention index (RI) is defined as the difference in standardized uptake value between early and late imaging expressed as a percentage of the initial uptake (RI= (SUV delayed − SUV early )/SUV early × 100%). These reports have generally been favorable showing improvement in detection or contrast for brain [2], breast [3], lung [4], pancreas [5][6][7], gallbladder [8], hepatocellular [9], cervical [10,11], intra-abdominal [12], intra-thoracic [13], soft-tissue [14], and other tumors [15,16]. For nasopharyngeal carcinoma, high sensitivity did not improve with delayed imaging [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that even though in patients with hepatocarcinoma the delayed PET acquisition did not bring any benefits (probably due to the similar FDG metabolism in well-differentiated hepatocarcinoma and in normal liver tissue [20,21]), delayed images proved useful in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer [22]. Finally, Nishiyama et al [23] studied the utility of PET in 86 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer acquiring early (1 h postinjection) and delayed (2 h postinjection) PET scans. They concluded that the mean lesion SUV of the delayed exam was significantly higher compared with that of the early one.…”
Section: Discussionementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that the mean lesion SUV of the delayed exam was significantly higher compared with that of the early one. Moreover, the delayed PET scan enabled identification of further liver metastases [23].…”
Section: Discussionementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings were considered to be positive when both of the radiologists strongly suspected malignant disease. In addition, the images were analyzed semiquantitatively using the SUV, as reported elsewhere [7] . Briefly, regions of interest measuring 1.0 cm 2 were drawn over the area of maximum activity in a lesion.…”
Section: Fdg-petmentioning
confidence: 99%