2019 18th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icmla.2019.00321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Deep Learning for Semantic Image Segmentation in Tool Condition Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the commands issued to the machine, especially the unplanned interactions of the machine's operator, are stored. After each experiment, the condition of the cutting tool insert, expressed as flank wear width, is measured with the procedure described in Lutz et al (2019). A unique identifier, batch A-E, is assigned to each investigated material batch.…”
Section: Cutting Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the commands issued to the machine, especially the unplanned interactions of the machine's operator, are stored. After each experiment, the condition of the cutting tool insert, expressed as flank wear width, is measured with the procedure described in Lutz et al (2019). A unique identifier, batch A-E, is assigned to each investigated material batch.…”
Section: Cutting Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout operation, the used cutting tools experience wear and are exchanged once the operator judges that they reach their end-of-life, with the exchange times being recorded by the operator. The wornout cutting tool inserts are evaluated using a tool maker's microscope (see Figure 3) and the image evaluation procedure proposed in [25]. Thereby, ground-truth data about the actual tool condition are generated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the absolute value of tool condition is investigated as well. Tool wear was measured at the insert radius with the image evaluation procedure [25], yielding the average flank wear width. These values thus represent the ground truth of the wear at the end of each tool's lifetime and are represented as circles in Figure 7.…”
Section: Tool Condition Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated an average recognition precision rate of 96.20% in tool wear classification (flank wear, tool breakage, adhesive wear and rake face wear). Other applications are required to stop the machining process for the tool wear measurement [32,104], with significant limits in terms of time waste. Despite the high model accuracy and precision of direct methods, the request to stop the MT generates several issues in production.…”
Section: Tool Condition Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it allows the implementation of simpler ML methods, such as k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) or simple ANNs or a Decision Tree (DT). Beside this application, the actual use of DL algorithms in machining in the substitution of ML reduces the number of the required steps, since feature extraction and selection (4 to 5) is typically done by the same model [31,32]. These steps may improve the final results of the DL applications, as highlighted in References [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%