2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-01954-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of decellularization protocols for production of porcine small intestine submucosa for use in abdominal wall reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although other studies have reported a significant reduction of DNA content (up to 98%) after NaOH‐based decellularization, 21‐23 the DNA content was decreased only by 41% compared to native vessels in this study (Figure 2). DNase treatment, as well as incubation with FCS, reduced the DNA content by 89% or 92%, respectively, compared to native vessels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although other studies have reported a significant reduction of DNA content (up to 98%) after NaOH‐based decellularization, 21‐23 the DNA content was decreased only by 41% compared to native vessels in this study (Figure 2). DNase treatment, as well as incubation with FCS, reduced the DNA content by 89% or 92%, respectively, compared to native vessels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…For instance, Daugs et al reported that perfusion of bovine carotid arteries at high, physiological rates resulted in a better removal of cellular material compared to low-flow rates employing 1% of sodium deoxycholate solution as decellularization agent. 33 Although other studies have reported a significant reduction of DNA content (up to 98%) after NaOH-based decellularization, [21][22][23] the DNA content was decreased only by 41% compared to native vessels in this study (Figure 2). DNase treatment, as well as incubation with FCS, reduced the DNA content by 89% or 92%, respectively, compared to native vessels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, nature SIS is composed of collagen, glycoproteins, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), and proteoglycans should capture greater cellular signalling than other scaffold materials [11]. In the recent decade, the SIS has been used as a transplanted structural material in several clinical applications, such as for chronic wounds and burns [12], abdominal walls [13,14], cardiovascular tissue [15], and as a cell scaffold for intervertebral disc reconstructions [16]. After transplantation, the SIS was replaced by collagens [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%