“…The first-generation of epidrugs included DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (the nucleoside analogs of DNMTi: 5-azacytidine, AZA [ 81 ], Vidaza ® ; 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, decytabine [ 82 ], Dacogen ® ), and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi, the hydroxamic acids: suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA, vorinostat [ 83 ], Zolinza ® ; trichostatin A, TSA [ 84 ]; cyclic peptides: trapoxin A, FK228, romidepsin [ 85 ], Istodax ® ) with a low degree of selectivity, and showed undesirable pharmacokinetic properties, poor target selectivity, and low bioavailability, were more active within non-physiological pH ranges, and are targets of cellular deaminases, which ultimately mean a short half-life for these compounds. The second-generation of epidrugs have improved physiological properties, including DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (the nucleoside analogs of DNMTi: zebularine; guadecitabine, S110 or SGI-110 [ 79 ], and non-nucleoside analogs: hydralazine, procainamide, RG108), and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi: hydroxamic acid: belinostat, Beleodaq ® ; dacinostat; panobinostat [ 85 ], Farydak ® ; quisinostat [ 86 ]; benzamides: etinostat; mocetinostat [ 81 ]; chidamide, Tucidinostat, Epidaza ® ; carboxylic acids: valproic acid [ 87 ]). The mechanism of interaction of the third generation of epidrugs corresponds to the assumption that epigenetic factors could write, delete, or read epigenetic marks in the form of protein complexes, which is essential for the design of highly selective epidrugs.…”