1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02574800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of data for Sinkhole-development risk models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors have transformed sinkhole density maps into susceptibility maps assuming implicitly that the zones with a larger number of sinkholes or with a higher percentage area occupied by sinkholes are more prone to sinkhole formation (Ogden and Reger, 1977;Brook and Allison, 1986;Upchurch and Littlefield, 1988;Ragozin et al, 2005). Another option is to produce susceptibility zonations using the distance of each point to the nearest sinkhole (nearest neighbour distance).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some authors have transformed sinkhole density maps into susceptibility maps assuming implicitly that the zones with a larger number of sinkholes or with a higher percentage area occupied by sinkholes are more prone to sinkhole formation (Ogden and Reger, 1977;Brook and Allison, 1986;Upchurch and Littlefield, 1988;Ragozin et al, 2005). Another option is to produce susceptibility zonations using the distance of each point to the nearest sinkhole (nearest neighbour distance).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It should be noted that the method does not a priori fix the criteria for assessing the collapse susceptibility of underground structures in general, but offers management tools once the most relevant of these have been identified. The quality of the obtained results depends entirely on the relevance of the selected criteria and thus on the understanding of the phenomena (Upchurch and Littlefield, 1988;Benson et al 2003;Hubbard, 2003;Brinkmann et al, 2008). Although the method endeavours to control and limit the subjectivity of expert judgement, the expertise is still the central point.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), the expert, on the basis of his experience and his regional knowledge, synthesizes and interprets the commonly imprecise, if not vague, information obtained from the inventory and the geological and historicaleconomic contexts. As several authors have already pointed out relative to all types of underground structure (Upchurch and Littlefield, 1988;Benson et al 2003;Hubbard, 2003;Brinkmann et al, 2008), the essential aspect of the expertise is the identification of the theoretical controlling factors regulating the occurrence of the disturbances, i.e. the equivalent of the step 2 of the methodology.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature on this theme, thickness of cover plays an important role (Palmquist, 1979;Lamoreaux & Newton, 1986;Yuan, 1988;White & White, 1986;Upchurch & Littlefield, 1988). From the data obtained from drillings made in this area it is possible to determine with accuracy the variation of the thickness of the Quaternary materials.…”
Section: Physical Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%