1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02538514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of cyclic elastoplastic strains near notches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agreement happens for low and high loading amplitudes, for all radii of the notch [5,17] in the case where the distribution of local strains in the vicinity of the tip of the notch is calculated by the Usami relations [20] or by the formulas proposed by ourselves in [17,21] under the assumption that p = Pelf for sharp notches [21]. For plastic materials (AMg-6 alloy and 08kp steel), we compared the experimental data for the range of local elastoplastic strains AE* with the values of Ae x calculated on the basis of the curve of cyclic strain of smooth specimens [22] using the Neuber [23] and Glinka [24] approaches as well as calculated by the Stadnik-Riznichuk formula [25] modified for conditions of low-and multi-cycle loadings [17]. It turns out [17] that the best agreement between the experimental data for AE* and the results calculated by the Glinka formula occurs for any of the mentioned laws of distribution of local strains if the quantity x = h + d* is used for the calculation of A~ x [20,21].…”
Section: Plastic Materialssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This agreement happens for low and high loading amplitudes, for all radii of the notch [5,17] in the case where the distribution of local strains in the vicinity of the tip of the notch is calculated by the Usami relations [20] or by the formulas proposed by ourselves in [17,21] under the assumption that p = Pelf for sharp notches [21]. For plastic materials (AMg-6 alloy and 08kp steel), we compared the experimental data for the range of local elastoplastic strains AE* with the values of Ae x calculated on the basis of the curve of cyclic strain of smooth specimens [22] using the Neuber [23] and Glinka [24] approaches as well as calculated by the Stadnik-Riznichuk formula [25] modified for conditions of low-and multi-cycle loadings [17]. It turns out [17] that the best agreement between the experimental data for AE* and the results calculated by the Glinka formula occurs for any of the mentioned laws of distribution of local strains if the quantity x = h + d* is used for the calculation of A~ x [20,21].…”
Section: Plastic Materialssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…We compared the experimental values for the range of local strains Ae* found by the procedure mentioned above with the strain range Ae x, calculated by the known formulas presented in [17], at the tip of the notch (x = h) and at the point (x = h + d* ), i.e., on the boundary of the characteristic zone d*.…”
Section: Plastic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was taken that the period prior to the initial microcrack initiation N i was equal to the number of load cycles prior to the formation of a crack = d* * * with length a i [17]. Dependences ( AOy, Ni) and (d, Ni) were constructed by using the stress approach [17], and dependences (Ae*, Ni) and (d*, Ni) by using the strain approach [20,21]. The values of A~y and Ae* were used as the parameters of cyclic crack resistance at the stage of macrocrack initiation for N i = 3 9 105 and N i = 3 9 102 in the low-amplitude and high-amplitude regions of the diagrams, respectively (see Table 1).…”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters were determined within the frameworks of the stress [15,16] and strain [20,21] approaches. It was taken that the period prior to the initial microcrack initiation N i was equal to the number of load cycles prior to the formation of a crack = d* * * with length a i [17].…”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%