2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-015-1881-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of cursive and non-cursive scripts using recurrent neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, the results have been reported on custom-developed databases making it difficult to objectively compare different systems. Comparison of our system can be carried out with [5,[16][17][18]22] and [5,10,13,19,21,28,29] on the basis of database used (UPTI) and recognition unit (ligatures), respectively. The recognition rates of these studies are summarized in Table 10.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In most cases, the results have been reported on custom-developed databases making it difficult to objectively compare different systems. Comparison of our system can be carried out with [5,[16][17][18]22] and [5,10,13,19,21,28,29] on the basis of database used (UPTI) and recognition unit (ligatures), respectively. The recognition rates of these studies are summarized in Table 10.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition rates of these studies are summarized in Table 10. It should however be noted that we employ ligatures as basic units of recognition as opposed to characters in [16][17][18]22]. Consequently, we report the ligature recognition rates while the implicit segmentation-based studies listed in Table 10 report character recognition rates.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported 97.63 % accuracy on character recognition of Urdu language. Another work on offline handwritten Urdu recognition by BLSTM is proposed by [5]. They had taken samples from different users on plain paper and applied horizontal profile for text line segmentation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahmed et al [13] have employed a special type of recurrent neural network, called bidirectional long short-term memory (BLSTM) networks, to propose segmentation-free optical character recognition system. BLSTM has proven its efficiency in many research areas due to its ability to remember events when there are long time lags between events.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%