2017
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12394-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of cross sections for neutron interactions with 238U in the energy region between 5 keV and 150 keV

Abstract: Cross sections for neutron interactions with 238 U in the energy region from 5 keV to 150 keV have been evaluated. Average total and capture cross sections have been derived from a least squares analysis using experimental data reported in the literature. The resulting cross sections have been parameterised in terms of average resonance parameters maintaining full consistency with results of optical model calculations by using a dispersive coupled channel optical model potential. The average compound partial c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IAEA CIELO 238 U (n,g) cross sections were adopted from Neutron Standards fit [19] and are shown in Figure 4b compared to evaluated JEFF-3.3 cross section. Evaluated reference 238 U (n,g) cross sections within the Neutron Standards are in excellent agreement with newest highaccuracy measurement at JRC Geel [32,33], while the evaluated JEFF-3.3 cross sections are lower in the whole energy range. The difference between both evaluations reaches about 7% around 45 keV.…”
Section: Capture Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…IAEA CIELO 238 U (n,g) cross sections were adopted from Neutron Standards fit [19] and are shown in Figure 4b compared to evaluated JEFF-3.3 cross section. Evaluated reference 238 U (n,g) cross sections within the Neutron Standards are in excellent agreement with newest highaccuracy measurement at JRC Geel [32,33], while the evaluated JEFF-3.3 cross sections are lower in the whole energy range. The difference between both evaluations reaches about 7% around 45 keV.…”
Section: Capture Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…An important precondition is the correct determination of the sample burnup. However, for large-scale fuel assembly loading and preparation for final storage use of burnup (Sirakov et al, 2017) relevant for criticality, burnup credit and dose rate (primary decay modes in yellow: α; black: stable; blue: β -).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, newer evaluations of nuclear data do not necessarily lead to higher quality. In (Sirakov et al, 2017) the cross section for 238 U (n,γ) in JEF-2.2 were compared with the JEFF-3.3 recommendations. New measurements showed better agreement with JEF-2.2.…”
Section: Frontiers In Energy Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[29]) and the neutron standards projects [22]. Recent evaluations largely based on data from GELINA are: 107,109 Ag [13], 99 Tc [30], 241 Am [31], 238 U [32], 197 Au [14,22], 16 O(n,) [33], 175 Lu [34] and Mo [12].…”
Section: Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%