2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of criteria for clinical control in a prospective, international, multicenter study of patients with COPD

Abstract: The proposed criteria of control were only fulfilled by 21% of patients. The suggested cut offs and their predictive value for poor outcomes need to be refined in prospective studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
11

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
25
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the controlled patients had a better HRQoL throughout this period. These results corroborate previous studies that have highlighted the value of the clinical control concept as a means of evaluating and monitoring patients with COPD (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the controlled patients had a better HRQoL throughout this period. These results corroborate previous studies that have highlighted the value of the clinical control concept as a means of evaluating and monitoring patients with COPD (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Clinical control is de ned as the long-term persistence of a situation of low clinical impact; in other words, it is composed of a transversal dimension (the clinical impact) together with a longitudinal one (clinical stability), determined by exacerbations or worsening over time. Studies have shown that clinical control can be achieved by an acceptable proportion of patients, even among those with greater air ow limitation (11)(12)(13)(14), although control status may vary over time (15), and that patients whose condition is uncontrolled are at greater risk of unfavourable outcomes (16). However, in the absence of previous research in this area, it is unclear whether patients who are clinically controlled have less symptom burdenand a better HRQoLthan those who are not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently reported multicentre, observational study in Europe classified 21% of COPD patients as 'controlled', using the same CAT score criteria. 18 However, all patients classified had mild-to-moderate COPD. Most patients in the SPRINT cohort were elderly (median age 70 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Taken together, these results suggest that a CAT threshold of 10 is probably too low to define low COPD symptom burden. 18,19 In view of the lack of reversibility that is typical of COPD, the threshold might need to be adapted to the baseline severity of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to define the control status, diagnostic criteria have been proposed based on a combination of different clinical parameters (degree of dyspnoea, use of rescue medication, physical activity, sputum colour, presence of exacerbations and the patients' perception of their own health), or an alternative based on the use of validated clinical questionnaires such as the CAT 56 or Clinical COPD Questionnaires (CCQ) 57 ( Table 2). These diagnosis criteria have been recently validated, demonstrating that clinical control is an objective which is attainable in the short-term, dynamic over time, sensitive to change and associated with a better outcome in the short and long-term, with a lower risk of future exacerbations and better HRQoL 55,[58][59][60] . For all these reasons, clinical control has been proposed as a new comprehensive therapeutic objective with a key role in clinical decision making 61 .…”
Section: Relevance Of Symptom Variability For Clinical Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%