2001
DOI: 10.1002/jps.1109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Creatine Transport Using Caco‐2 Monolayers as an In Vitro Model for Intestinal Absorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Side by side diffusion chambers were used to study the transport across the cell monolayers as previously described. 17 In brief, fresh assay II buffer (3 mL) was placed in the receiver chamber. The donor chamber contained 3 mL of either free PTX solution (25 µg/mL) or gel containing PTX (25 µg/mL).…”
Section: Transport Of Ptx Via In Vitro Cell Culture Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Side by side diffusion chambers were used to study the transport across the cell monolayers as previously described. 17 In brief, fresh assay II buffer (3 mL) was placed in the receiver chamber. The donor chamber contained 3 mL of either free PTX solution (25 µg/mL) or gel containing PTX (25 µg/mL).…”
Section: Transport Of Ptx Via In Vitro Cell Culture Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimize these negative effects, Creatine Hydrocloride (CrHCl) was introduced in the market by Dash et al [7], which is a molecule that is supposed to be 41 times more soluble in water than creatine monohydrate [8]. Moreover, it appears that its permeability in the intestinal tract is also greater than CrM [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding creatine, transport was investigated in several cell types; in spite of the increasing physiological relevance of oral creatine supplementation, there is a lack of information regarding intestinal creatine transporter(s), and only few studies have tried to elucidate the mechanisms involved (Peral et al ., ; Persky et al ., ). As reported by other researchers (Dash et al ., ; Vennerstrom & Miller, ), creatine shows poor apical to basolateral permeation in the Caco‐2 cell line model, with a transport of 0.1–14%. This low rate is generally attributed to the low solubility of creatine in water (1.3 g L −1 at 20 °C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%