2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of COVID-19 Mortality and Adverse Outcomes in US Patients With or Without Cancer

Abstract: As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, understanding the clinical outcomes of patients with cancer and COVID-19 has become critically important.OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of patients with or without cancer who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and to identify the factors associated with mortality, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospitalization. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis cohort study obtained data from the Optum de-identified COVID-19 electronic health record data set. Mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
146
1
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(110 reference statements)
14
146
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…5,62,63 Lastly, most studies also support our findings on the increased Covid-19 adverse outcome in hematologic cancer population with 34.2% case fatality rate (480 hematologic cancer), (120 hematologic cancer, 758 control, OR 2.39, CI 1.17-4.87, p 0.02, I 2 49%) in other meta analyses. 62,63,65-68. We believe our meta-analysis results correspond to several studies that present the safety of continuing gynecologic cancer care and service during the global pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5,62,63 Lastly, most studies also support our findings on the increased Covid-19 adverse outcome in hematologic cancer population with 34.2% case fatality rate (480 hematologic cancer), (120 hematologic cancer, 758 control, OR 2.39, CI 1.17-4.87, p 0.02, I 2 49%) in other meta analyses. 62,63,65-68. We believe our meta-analysis results correspond to several studies that present the safety of continuing gynecologic cancer care and service during the global pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…[5][6][7][61][62][63][64][65] 66 Our finding shows gynecologic cancer with metastatic disease has an increased Covid-19 death compared to whose cancer are localized (OR 1.53, CI 1.06-2.21, p 0.02, I 2 0%), most studies also report identical outcomes to ours. 65,67,68 Our analysis also shows gynecologic cancer is associated with higher Covid-19 death and hospitalization compared to breast cancer patients (OR 1.51, CI 1.20-1.90, p 0.0004, I 2 21%), (OR 1.52, CI 1.18-1.96, p 0.001, I 2 0%) respectively. Other meta-analyses, as well as studies done by "CCC19" and the "N3C" also supported this finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients with both cancer and COVID-19 infection often have a more severe clinical course with worse outcomes, and lethality rates of up to 25%. Indeed, the risk of adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection is significantly higher for patients with cancer than for the general population across a broad spectrum of malignancies; the patients are often immunocompromised and older (aged ≥ 60 years) with one or more comorbidities [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Because of the higher risk of severe evolution of COVID-19, a more intensive surveillance strategy should be incorporated into the clinical management of cancer patients (especially those with active malignancy), including early evaluation of symptoms and early treatment for COVID-19.…”
Section: Silibinin-treated Cancer/covid-19+ Patients: Clinical Lesson...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 COVID-19 has also adversely impacted screening, 4 diagnosis, 5 and survival from lung cancer. 6 Moreover, concerns have been raised about adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on smokers trying to quit in the United States. 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%