SAE Technical Paper Series 2005
DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-3578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Cost Effective Sensor Combinations for a Vehicle Precrash Detection System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre-crash systems are being discussed mostly for frontal impact [15], being detection technologies and Automated Emergency Braking Systems in the State of the art. The present work shows the potential of these systems in the event of side impact in terms of improved biomechanical dummy values, even when starting from a reference vehicle with a very good performance under Euro NCAP side impact assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-crash systems are being discussed mostly for frontal impact [15], being detection technologies and Automated Emergency Braking Systems in the State of the art. The present work shows the potential of these systems in the event of side impact in terms of improved biomechanical dummy values, even when starting from a reference vehicle with a very good performance under Euro NCAP side impact assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonic sensors are being expensive nowadays as they are the inseparable part of Adaptive cruise control system. However, the additional cost of implementation is lowered [6]. LIDAR frameworks costly frameworks that are fixed on outer part of automobiles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensing is critical to any collision warning/avoidance system used in automotive industry. Various sensing methods, including ultrasonic sensors, optical and infrared cameras, RADAR and LIDAR, are compared in Carlin et al 20 and Rasshofer and Gresser. 21 In this project, ultrasonic sensors were selected for cyclist detection and motion estimation over other sensing methods because The characteristics of the detection area are well suited to cyclist detection.…”
Section: Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%