2021
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-7341-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of convective boundary layer height estimates using radars operating at different frequency bands

Abstract: Abstract. Knowledge of the atmospheric boundary layer state and evolution is important for understanding air pollution and low-level cloud development, among other things. There are a number of instruments and methods that are currently used to estimate boundary layer height (BLH). However, no single instrument is capable of providing BLH measurements in all weather conditions. We proposed a method to derive a daytime convective BLH using clear air echoes in radar observations and investigated the consistency … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 10:00 UTC (11:40 LST, 13:00 local legal time), the MWR BL height mostly follows the 10 • C isotherm at an altitude of 1 km a.g.l, while the BL height from ERA5 is higher, typically at 1.5 km a.g.l. The BL height in the cloud classification product is between 0.8-1.2 km a.g.l., indicated approximately by the top of the insects category (Chandra et al, 2010;Franck et al, 2021), and resembles the MWR BL height evolution, even though the MWR estimates the BL height slightly higher. This suggests that between 10:00-17:00 UTC, ERA5 overestimates the BL height.…”
Section: Bl Height Diagnosed From Microwave Radiometer Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…After 10:00 UTC (11:40 LST, 13:00 local legal time), the MWR BL height mostly follows the 10 • C isotherm at an altitude of 1 km a.g.l, while the BL height from ERA5 is higher, typically at 1.5 km a.g.l. The BL height in the cloud classification product is between 0.8-1.2 km a.g.l., indicated approximately by the top of the insects category (Chandra et al, 2010;Franck et al, 2021), and resembles the MWR BL height evolution, even though the MWR estimates the BL height slightly higher. This suggests that between 10:00-17:00 UTC, ERA5 overestimates the BL height.…”
Section: Bl Height Diagnosed From Microwave Radiometer Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The high sensitivity to low reflectivities means that millimetre‐wavelength radars (e.g. Ka‐ and W‐band) can see small insects that may not be detectable by radars operating at S‐band or X‐band (Franck et al, 2021).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 To derive the Convective Boundary Layer Height (CBLH), the researchers proposed a method utilizing clear air echoes in radar observations and assessed the consistency of retrievals among different radar frequencies. 4 In a comparative study, JC (1982) evaluated three in-situ and five remote sensing techniques for measuring the height of the daytime CBL, and they found rawinsonde to be effective but with some uncertainty. For remote sensing, a combination of methods was recommended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%