2003
DOI: 10.2175/106143003x141213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Constructed Wetland Treatment Performance for Winery Wastewater

Abstract: Rapid expansion of wineries in rural California during the past three decades has created contamination problems related to winery wastewater treatment and disposal; however, little information is available about performance of on‐site treatment systems. Here, the project objective was to determine full‐scale, subsurface‐flow constructed wetland retention times and treatment performance through assessment of water quality by daily sampling of total dissolved solids, pH, total suspended solids, chemical oxygen … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(18 reference statements)
3
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, the small volumes of winery wastewater that were produced by wineries had little effect on the immediate environment, but with increasing wine production all around the world, winery wastewater is a rising concern for the contamination of subsurface flow, soil and the environment (Grismer et al, 2003).…”
Section: Why Manage Waste/wastewater?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, the small volumes of winery wastewater that were produced by wineries had little effect on the immediate environment, but with increasing wine production all around the world, winery wastewater is a rising concern for the contamination of subsurface flow, soil and the environment (Grismer et al, 2003).…”
Section: Why Manage Waste/wastewater?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive research reviews of brewery, winery and related distillery treatment methods for process wastewater have underscored the need for additional research, particularly of fullscale systems and individual processes (Grismer and Shepherd 1998;Grismer et al 1999Grismer et al , 2000Grismer et al , 2002Grismer et al , 2003. evaluated the performance of a subsurface-flow wetland (20 feet long, 8 feet wide and 4 feet deep) in treating winery process wastewater flows ranging from 80 to 170 cubic meters per day at organic loads of 600 to 45,000 milligrams COD per liter (mg COD/l), and measured average removal rates of 98% for COD and 97% for total suspended solids (TSS) when combining the constructed wetland with an upflow sand prefilter.…”
Section: Constructed-wetland Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the only published field-scale evaluation, Grismer et al (2003) -using tracer methods developed by Grismer et al (2001) -measured constructed-wetland degradation constants, HRTs and treatment performance at two operating wineries. System performance was evaluated through daily sampling of total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, total suspended solids, COD, tannins, nitrate, ammonium, TKN, phosphate, sulfate and sulfide.…”
Section: Constructed-wetland Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…O aumento do pH também pode ter favorecido a remoção de F T nos SAC F s, apesar do aumento na taxa de carga dessas substâncias, ocorrido nesta fase; no entanto, verificou-se diminuição na eficiência de remoção de F T com o aumento da TCO A aplicada nos SAC . Grismer et al (2003) utilizando sistemas alagados construídos no tratamento de águas residuárias da produção de vinho, obtiveram remoções de 48 a 78% de F T .…”
Section: Methodsunclassified