Evaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions

Akbulut, Aslıhan; Kılınç, Delal Dara

doi:10.1007/s11282-018-0326-z

Cited by 8 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The association of joint space features and condylar positions with maxillofacial morphology and malocclusion was addressed in 19 articles included in the systematic review. These studies were published between 2012 and 2021 and involved patient populations from China [22,46], Brazil [35,44,47], India [48,49], Peru [34], Iran [25], Nepal [50], Turkey [51,52], South Korea [24,[53][54][55], Egypt [56,57], and Ukraine [58]. Sample sizes ranged from 20 [50] to 180 [35] patients.…”

Section: Joint Space and Condylar Position In Tmj In Cbctmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the Morphology and Degenerative Changes in the Temporomandibular Joint Using CBCT according to the Orthodontic Approach: A Scoping Review

Dygas

Szarmach

Radej

2022

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Available knowledge about disorders of temporomandibular joint structures and their association with orthodontic variables are still lacking. Objectives. This article is aimed at to identifying studies and presenting current information on the relationship between morphology diversity and the occurrence of degenerative changes in structures of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) assessed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the context of craniofacial morphology and malocclusion. Search Methods. The review was conducted by analyzing the PubMed (including Medline), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases up to November 2021 using two different comprehensive search strategies based on keywords as well as additional manual searches. Eligibility Criteria. Selection of the literature was carried out according to the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Methodological quality of the selected studies was evaluated using JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. Results. The electronic databases search revealed 3331 records. After applying the eligibility criteria and JBI assessment, a total of 33 studies were extracted and selected to the study. The review was divided into 4 parts, in which the following correlations were assessed in terms of orthodontic variables: TMJ degenerative changes, joint space and condylar position, condylar shape, TMJ articular eminence, and fossa. Conclusions. Skeletal and dental class II malocclusion with a retrognathic mandible, a hypodivergent skeletal pattern with a steep mandibular plane, and significant lateral mandibular displacement can be risk factors for developing radiographically detectable degenerative changes. Patients with skeletal and dental class III malocclusion as well as a hyperdivergent skeletal pattern may be at greater risk of TMD occurrence compared with other groups. Further studies are necessary to clarify the relationship between the position of the condylar processes and the presence of degenerative changes in the temporomandibular joints among orthodontic patients.

show abstract

Section: Joint Space and Condylar Position In Tmj In Cbctmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the Morphology and Degenerative Changes in the Temporomandibular Joint Using CBCT according to the Orthodontic Approach: A Scoping Review

Dygas

Szarmach

Radej

2022

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Differences in the Angle's classification with the condyles in MIP and CO are documented. [13][14][15][16][17][18] Angle's classification provides important information regarding the occlusal relationships of the opposing teeth. In orthodontics the classification has been recorded in MIP through the handheld articulation of opposing casts and the condylar position has not been considered.…”

Section: Consensus Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In a retrospective study of 60 patients using CBCT's taken in MIP, Akbulut and Kilinic 17 analyzed condylar position for Angle's Class I, II, and III patients (MIP determined). They concluded the left and right condyles were not symmetrically located in the right and left glenoid fossae.…”

Section: Focus Question 1: For Partially and Completely Dentate Patiementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Angle's Classification–A Prosthodontic Consideration: Best Evidence Consensus Statement

Campbell

Goldstein

2021

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This Best Evidence Consensus Statement evaluated the existing Angle's classification clinical literature to determine if the Angle's classification as historically determined in maximum intercuspal position (MIP) with hand held casts is coincident with the centric occlusion (CO) determined Angle's classification. In addition, it explored the value of using Angle's classification for edentulous patients Materials and methods: The search strategy was related to the focus questions and limited to Meta-analyses, Systematic Reviews (SR), Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and Clinical Trials. Searches were completed using the term Angle's classification and Boolean Modifiers (AND) with the key terms: dental occlusion, dental occlusion centric, centric occlusion, centric relation, maximal intercuspation, MIP, intercuspal position, and edentulous patient, retrognathia, determination, and prognathia. Additional related articles were culled from the reference lists in the articles found in the PubMed searches. Results: The search identified 494 articles related to the selected terminology. Titles were reviewed and selected if related to the focus questions for further review. Seven papers could be identified that addressed the specifics of the questions. Conclusions: There is evidence that the Angle's classification for many patients will change when recorded in CO compared to the historical MIP determination/definition. A different Angle's classification recorded in CO is potentially a significant diagnostic finding for patients needing complete mouth rehabilitation. The current definitions of Angle's Classification are not useful in the management of edentulous patients.

show abstract

“…Usually, the lower front teeth are more noticeable than the higher front teeth. The patient usually has a big mandible and a short maxillary bone in this scenario (Gravely and Johnson, 1974;Akbulut and Kılınç, 2019;Campbell and Goldstein, 2021). Figure 1 illustrates the different types of malocclusions.…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review on Anterior Crossbite Diagnosis and Management Approach in Paediatric Age, Literature Review

Alqahtani¹,

Alshaks²,

Alshahrani³

et al. 2021

World Journal of Environmental Biosciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions

Cited by 8 publications

References 30 publications

Assessment of the Morphology and Degenerative Changes in the Temporomandibular Joint Using CBCT according to the Orthodontic Approach: A Scoping Review

Assessment of the Morphology and Degenerative Changes in the Temporomandibular Joint Using CBCT according to the Orthodontic Approach: A Scoping Review

Angle's Classification–A Prosthodontic Consideration: Best Evidence Consensus Statement

Review on Anterior Crossbite Diagnosis and Management Approach in Paediatric Age, Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About